Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 960703" data-attributes="member: 13254">Point one:You are still relying on articles from the media. The link you finally provided is from an obviously prejudiced site. Despite that the article from the link has inaccuracies that are easily suspect. Here is an insert from the article. Point two:I checked the organizations data base for Sanford, Fl, the only watch group in this area that is part of their program is overseen byOviedo Police Department, in Miami-Dade County. Sanford is in Seminole county. Sanford&#039;s police dept seems to maintain their own neighborhood watch program. their wbsite makes no mention of USAonWatch-neighborhood watch. If Sanford&#039;s watch group is not affiliated with USonWatch, why would they have Zimmerman on their list?Point three:If the author of the article wanted to tell the real truth, she would have talked to the police in Sanford or the sheriff in Seminole county to inquire about Zimmerman&#039;s claimed association with a neighborhood watch.Point three:Still no link to the unedited 911 tapes. A search for such does not bring up an unedited tape.Point four:The one and ONLY thing I have denied is that you know any facts other than those provided by the media. The only spewing I have done is in response of your biased claims of superior knowledge.Point five:I am not now saying, nor have I EVER said that Zimmerman is not guilty of wrong doing. All I have said, time after time, is that all we know of this case is from the media and some of the media has twisted the truth, omitted part of the truth and down right lied about the supposed facts.The only time I insinuated that Zimmerman was innocent was in the fact that he has not yet been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.These above statements are the real &quot;simple stuff&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="trplnkl, post: 960703, member: 13254"] Point one: You are still relying on articles from the media. The link you finally provided is from an obviously prejudiced site. Despite that the article from the link has inaccuracies that are easily suspect. Here is an insert from the article. Point two: I checked the organizations data base for Sanford, Fl, the only watch group in this area that is part of their program is overseen byOviedo Police Department, in Miami-Dade County. Sanford is in Seminole county. Sanford's police dept seems to maintain their own neighborhood watch program. their wbsite makes no mention of USAonWatch-neighborhood watch. If Sanford's watch group is not affiliated with USonWatch, why would they have Zimmerman on their list? Point three: If the author of the article wanted to tell the real truth, she would have talked to the police in Sanford or the sheriff in Seminole county to inquire about Zimmerman's claimed association with a neighborhood watch. Point three: Still no link to the unedited 911 tapes. A search for such does not bring up an unedited tape. Point four: The one and ONLY thing I have denied is that you know any facts other than those provided by the media. The only spewing I have done is in response of your biased claims of superior knowledge. Point five: I am not now saying, nor have I EVER said that Zimmerman is not guilty of wrong doing. All I have said, time after time, is that all we know of this case is from the media and some of the media has twisted the truth, omitted part of the truth and down right lied about the supposed facts. The only time I insinuated that Zimmerman was innocent was in the fact that he has not yet been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. These above statements are the real "simple stuff". [/QUOTE]

Verification