Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 978829" data-attributes="member: 2189">So you want to carry that gun in public?&nbsp; Go ahead but it may not be the so-called criminal element who is the most threat to you.Cops gun down man for legally carrying firearmBut then, this is the actions of our &quot;HEROES&quot; so we must drop on bended knee to worship this blessed event to protect us!I defend Scott&#039;s right to freely carry even without that permission slip from the State but had Scott been just as observant of property rights as he was guns rights, this whole thing may never have happened. When confronted and asked to leave, he should had responded, &quot;I apoligize for violating store policy and will depart from your property immediately&quot; and then complied completely with that leaving the store in due hast.Just as Scott has no obligation to shop at Costco, the store has every right to dictate terms and conditions as it pertains to those who enter upon it&#039;s property.&nbsp;&nbsp; When it comes to private individuals, property rights trump gun rights every time in my book but that doesn&#039;t give a state thug just cause to gun him down.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 978829, member: 2189"] So you want to carry that gun in public? Go ahead but it may not be the so-called criminal element who is the most threat to you. [B][COLOR=#ff0000][SIZE=2]Cops gun down man for legally carrying firearm[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] But then, this is the actions of our "HEROES" so we must drop on bended knee to worship this blessed event to protect us! I defend Scott's right to freely carry even without that permission slip from the State but had Scott been just as observant of property rights as he was guns rights, this whole thing may never have happened. When confronted and asked to leave, he should had responded, "I apoligize for violating store policy and will depart from your property immediately" and then complied completely with that leaving the store in due hast. Just as Scott has no obligation to shop at Costco, the store has every right to dictate terms and conditions as it pertains to those who enter upon it's property. When it comes to private individuals, property rights trump gun rights every time in my book but that doesn't give a state thug just cause to gun him down. [/QUOTE]

Verification