Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 896791" data-attributes="member: 2189">Funny when a person is called muslim, this principle doesn&#039;t apply and now when it&#039;s someone you like, you are now all over it.&nbsp; Your support of the ideals of the previous administration at all costs out of fear of the other side (pun intended) it would appear is now coming back to haunt you.&nbsp; You should have lived that &quot;PRINCIPLE&quot; all along instead of now being seen as purely an opportunist.As for Cain being a man of honor and integrity,There could be more witnesses to come forward at some point in the near future which could seriously question your assessment of candidate Cain.BTW: Harrison&#039;s quote was also at one time a generally accepted ideal and it mainly applied when the state wanted to deprive an individual of his life, liberty or property and not the result of private party claims.&nbsp; In Cain&#039;s case, it&#039;s not the state out to deny him anything and if there&#039;s a beauty to this, he&#039;s being denied access to control the State.&nbsp; If we can crush them all showing none have honor or integrity, it then becomes obvious our choices are among men and women of the worst sort. We just might then wake up on election day morning with purpose to go do something more worthwhile and productive to genuine free society than stand in line voting for someone who will allow us to pick our neighbor&#039;s pocket under the color of law.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 896791, member: 2189"] Funny when a person is called muslim, this principle doesn't apply and now when it's someone you like, you are now all over it. Your support of the ideals of the previous administration at all costs out of fear of the other side (pun intended) it would appear is now coming back to haunt you. You should have lived that "PRINCIPLE" all along instead of now being seen as purely an opportunist. As for Cain being a man of honor and integrity, There could be more witnesses to come forward at some point in the near future which could seriously question your assessment of candidate Cain. BTW: Harrison's quote was also at one time a generally accepted ideal and it mainly applied when the state wanted to deprive an individual of his life, liberty or property and not the result of private party claims. In Cain's case, it's not the state out to deny him anything and if there's a beauty to this, he's being denied access to control the State. If we can crush them all showing none have honor or integrity, it then becomes obvious our choices are among men and women of the worst sort. We just might then wake up on election day morning with purpose to go do something more worthwhile and productive to genuine free society than stand in line voting for someone who will allow us to pick our neighbor's pocket under the color of law. [/QUOTE]

Verification