Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Hilary Clinton
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rickyb" data-source="post: 3178781" data-attributes="member: 56035"><p>this one was retweeted by julian assange:</p><p></p><p>The only problem with that is that by no stretch of the imagination does it nullify the blatant power advantage Clinton was given by the rest of the agreement, which does indeed violate the DNC’s obligation of impartiality and neutrality through the nominating process. Scribbling the equivalent of “Oh hey, to anyone reading this in the future, we agree with each other that we’re not breaking any rules here” does not mean that rules were not broken. Scribbling “this is not a rule violation” on a rule violation, René Magritte style, doesn’t stop it from being a rule violation.</p><p></p><p>...Such large individual donations were permitted by campaign finance law via a loophole because the money was meant to be distributed throughout state party races across the country, but <a href="https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774" target="_blank">according to Donna Brazile</a> virtually all of it got funneled to the Clinton campaign.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=medium]d60019c59c3e[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rickyb, post: 3178781, member: 56035"] this one was retweeted by julian assange: The only problem with that is that by no stretch of the imagination does it nullify the blatant power advantage Clinton was given by the rest of the agreement, which does indeed violate the DNC’s obligation of impartiality and neutrality through the nominating process. Scribbling the equivalent of “Oh hey, to anyone reading this in the future, we agree with each other that we’re not breaking any rules here” does not mean that rules were not broken. Scribbling “this is not a rule violation” on a rule violation, René Magritte style, doesn’t stop it from being a rule violation. ...Such large individual donations were permitted by campaign finance law via a loophole because the money was meant to be distributed throughout state party races across the country, but [URL='https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774']according to Donna Brazile[/URL] virtually all of it got funneled to the Clinton campaign. [MEDIA=medium]d60019c59c3e[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Hilary Clinton
Top