Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 3484789" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>The wheels of justice move slowly, especially when it&#039;s necessary to make sure all the i&#039;s are dotted, etc when charging someone in her position.&nbsp; There&#039;s nothing desperate about it, and Trump&#039;s presidency is only a &quot;dumpster fire&quot; to those who want to characterize everything negatively.&nbsp; You say we shouldn&#039;t be talking like there is evidence in the meantime.&nbsp; It&#039;s a known fact that there was top secret classified material amongst the emails she did turn over.&nbsp; It&#039;s a known fact she eliminated 33,000 subpoenaed emails after being subpoenaed.&nbsp; And James Comey let her off the hook by saying there was no criminal intent.&nbsp; Taking a server off-site and eliminating them shows clear intent.&nbsp; And the law is clear about mishandling classified material and many others have paid serious consequences for doing so.&nbsp; Why not Hillary Clinton?&nbsp; She should&#039;ve been arrested and will be eventually.&nbsp; That she&#039;s constantly defended by her own party shows a clear double standard about how they feel Democrats and Republicans should be treated.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 3484789, member: 24302"] The wheels of justice move slowly, especially when it's necessary to make sure all the i's are dotted, etc when charging someone in her position. There's nothing desperate about it, and Trump's presidency is only a "dumpster fire" to those who want to characterize everything negatively. You say we shouldn't be talking like there is evidence in the meantime. It's a known fact that there was top secret classified material amongst the emails she did turn over. It's a known fact she eliminated 33,000 subpoenaed emails after being subpoenaed. And James Comey let her off the hook by saying there was no criminal intent. Taking a server off-site and eliminating them shows clear intent. And the law is clear about mishandling classified material and many others have paid serious consequences for doing so. Why not Hillary Clinton? She should've been arrested and will be eventually. That she's constantly defended by her own party shows a clear double standard about how they feel Democrats and Republicans should be treated. [/QUOTE]

Verification