Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
How bummed will Laguna and Tony Q be when this contract goes down in flames?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Real Jack RyanMI6" data-source="post: 3756106" data-attributes="member: 73481"><p>Im not really versed on all the players in the political side of all is from hoffa, to fred etc...</p><p>However, some arguments just make me wonder such as this one.</p><p>This is the richest contract ever!</p><p>So what can we learn from a box of cookies.</p><p>If you buy a box of 48 cookies you pay say $0.10 per cookie or $4.80 for your box of 48 cookies.</p><p>If you buy a box of 12 cookies you may pay $0.25 per cookie or $3.00 for your box of cookies. So whats my point. It only makes sense that being there are Significantly more Teamsters this contract, than before that UPS will be paying more money. The only question is did UPS pay more per Teamster than in other contracts or less per Teamster than in other contracts? If this really is the richest contract then why not make that argument both in terms of total dollars and on a per Teamster basis to the world put it in the WSJ have the Washington Post, or NY Times print it. So why havent they? If their right their right no need to hide or purposely pass over the simplest explanation, one available to any human who goes into a grocery store one that relies only on basic math! So why have those in charge purposely chosen to say vote Yes, but purposely not use the most basic, understandable, and uncomplicated arguments to prove their point. Just trust us and vote.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Real Jack RyanMI6, post: 3756106, member: 73481"] Im not really versed on all the players in the political side of all is from hoffa, to fred etc... However, some arguments just make me wonder such as this one. This is the richest contract ever! So what can we learn from a box of cookies. If you buy a box of 48 cookies you pay say $0.10 per cookie or $4.80 for your box of 48 cookies. If you buy a box of 12 cookies you may pay $0.25 per cookie or $3.00 for your box of cookies. So whats my point. It only makes sense that being there are Significantly more Teamsters this contract, than before that UPS will be paying more money. The only question is did UPS pay more per Teamster than in other contracts or less per Teamster than in other contracts? If this really is the richest contract then why not make that argument both in terms of total dollars and on a per Teamster basis to the world put it in the WSJ have the Washington Post, or NY Times print it. So why havent they? If their right their right no need to hide or purposely pass over the simplest explanation, one available to any human who goes into a grocery store one that relies only on basic math! So why have those in charge purposely chosen to say vote Yes, but purposely not use the most basic, understandable, and uncomplicated arguments to prove their point. Just trust us and vote. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
How bummed will Laguna and Tony Q be when this contract goes down in flames?
Top