Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 5666603" data-attributes="member: 24302">I believe the Clintons and the Bidens used their positions in government to receive tens of millions of dollars.&nbsp; In the case of Joe Biden that likely means he&#039;s compromised as president because of deals he, through his son, made.&nbsp; That matters in terms of our national security as well as the security of other countries who depend on us.&nbsp; Hillary would likely have been in a similar situation had she been elected.Is Trump in a similar position?&nbsp; Can you name any president who has been investigated and scrutinized in hopes of ruining him as much as Trump has?&nbsp; You may not like him personally, he may have policies Democrats don&#039;t want, but no one can say there&#039;s equivalent corruption.&nbsp; I&#039;m aware of the deal that Jared Kushner made to get $2 billion for his firm.&nbsp; Was that illegal?&nbsp; If so why isn&#039;t Merrick Garland going after him?&nbsp; You can&#039;t point to phony shell corporations set up for the sole purpose of funneling money to the Trumps like the Bidens did.&nbsp; You can&#039;t point to a huge foundation being set up receiving huge sums with little actually paid out in charitable work but was used for Clinton personal luxury travel expenses.&nbsp; And don&#039;t forget the speeches that put the Clintons personal net worth at over $100 million when they were touted as broke when Bill left the White House.&nbsp; Trump has done some shady stuff in the past that got his wrist slapped.&nbsp; Can you point to anything that rises to the level of the Bidens and Clintons?&nbsp; If you can then by all means arrest him for it and prosecute him for it.&nbsp; It&#039;s ludicrous to be trying him for holding on to classified documents while refusing to hold Hillary or Joe accountable for doing the same and acting like somehow what Trump did was much worse.&nbsp; It wasn&#039;t.&nbsp; Not even close.&nbsp; But he&#039;s the one getting tried by a Democratic Party establishment that has repeatedly gone after its enemies.&nbsp; Does it bother you at all that the White House is refusing to give RFK Jr Secret Service protection in spite of he is legally entitled to it as a presidential candidate and has made multiple requests?&nbsp; What a sad state of affairs you defend.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 5666603, member: 24302"] I believe the Clintons and the Bidens used their positions in government to receive tens of millions of dollars. In the case of Joe Biden that likely means he's compromised as president because of deals he, through his son, made. That matters in terms of our national security as well as the security of other countries who depend on us. Hillary would likely have been in a similar situation had she been elected. Is Trump in a similar position? Can you name any president who has been investigated and scrutinized in hopes of ruining him as much as Trump has? You may not like him personally, he may have policies Democrats don't want, but no one can say there's equivalent corruption. I'm aware of the deal that Jared Kushner made to get $2 billion for his firm. Was that illegal? If so why isn't Merrick Garland going after him? You can't point to phony shell corporations set up for the sole purpose of funneling money to the Trumps like the Bidens did. You can't point to a huge foundation being set up receiving huge sums with little actually paid out in charitable work but was used for Clinton personal luxury travel expenses. And don't forget the speeches that put the Clintons personal net worth at over $100 million when they were touted as broke when Bill left the White House. Trump has done some shady stuff in the past that got his wrist slapped. Can you point to anything that rises to the level of the Bidens and Clintons? If you can then by all means arrest him for it and prosecute him for it. It's ludicrous to be trying him for holding on to classified documents while refusing to hold Hillary or Joe accountable for doing the same and acting like somehow what Trump did was much worse. It wasn't. Not even close. But he's the one getting tried by a Democratic Party establishment that has repeatedly gone after its enemies. Does it bother you at all that the White House is refusing to give RFK Jr Secret Service protection in spite of he is legally entitled to it as a presidential candidate and has made multiple requests? What a sad state of affairs you defend. [/QUOTE]

Verification