Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
I want to live in I.E. world
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JustTired" data-source="post: 595062" data-attributes="member: 10234"><p>I would agree with the above statement.</p><p> </p><p>Let's look at an example of what I think has happened:</p><p> </p><p>Before the allowance was altered for the use of the diad and then the implementation of PAS/EDD, let's say the majority of drivers were running scratch (give or take). Now, should there have been a correction for the implementation of the above? Of course. But I think IE was a little over-optimistic in the time-savings of these implementations.</p><p> </p><p>I'm guessing that the thought was that.....given a few months, the drivers would adapt to these new standards, up their game, and ultimately be running scratch again. The problem being that the majority that were running scratch before were already performing at max capacity. Most likely, they were performing far better than the old studies would have expected.</p><p> </p><p>Now, everyone is left running well overallowed and are under constant scrutiny. That is why (in my opinion) the company is going away from time standards to the SPORH and demonstrated performance. It's evidently easier to find something else to pick on the drivers for.... rather than to reevaluate and fix the time allowances.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JustTired, post: 595062, member: 10234"] I would agree with the above statement. Let's look at an example of what I think has happened: Before the allowance was altered for the use of the diad and then the implementation of PAS/EDD, let's say the majority of drivers were running scratch (give or take). Now, should there have been a correction for the implementation of the above? Of course. But I think IE was a little over-optimistic in the time-savings of these implementations. I'm guessing that the thought was that.....given a few months, the drivers would adapt to these new standards, up their game, and ultimately be running scratch again. The problem being that the majority that were running scratch before were already performing at max capacity. Most likely, they were performing far better than the old studies would have expected. Now, everyone is left running well overallowed and are under constant scrutiny. That is why (in my opinion) the company is going away from time standards to the SPORH and demonstrated performance. It's evidently easier to find something else to pick on the drivers for.... rather than to reevaluate and fix the time allowances. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
I want to live in I.E. world
Top