Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 3294552" data-attributes="member: 63706">That may be the highest praise I could receive. I try to take that approach to any issue I take an interest in. I did receive formal education on carbon cycles in college biology and chemistry courses. But energy-efficiency and self-sufficiency have been personal pursuits of mine. The subjects are quite broad, and I have invested a lot of time and effort researching any subject related to them.It&#039;s been a challenge to share my thoughts and opinions on the global warming/climate change while keeping posts short enough to be appropriate for a forum. Don&#039;t know how many posts I&#039;ve written, then deleted before posting.In a nutshell I agree with this sentiment from [USER=55017]@It will be fine[/USER] :The main difference is that I&#039;m likely approaching it from the opposite side of the argument. I disagree with some of it, but it&#039;s close enough.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 3294552, member: 63706"] That may be the highest praise I could receive. I try to take that approach to any issue I take an interest in. I did receive formal education on carbon cycles in college biology and chemistry courses. But energy-efficiency and self-sufficiency have been personal pursuits of mine. The subjects are quite broad, and I have invested a lot of time and effort researching any subject related to them. It's been a challenge to share my thoughts and opinions on the global warming/climate change while keeping posts short enough to be appropriate for a forum. Don't know how many posts I've written, then deleted before posting. In a nutshell I agree with this sentiment from [USER=55017]@It will be fine[/USER] : The main difference is that I'm likely approaching it from the opposite side of the argument. I disagree with some of it, but it's close enough. [/QUOTE]

Verification