Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Integrity issues?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tieguy" data-source="post: 787546" data-attributes="member: 1912"><p>To me this discussion is the same as if I went to some remote section of Argentina and started a debate about john346's moral character. Since no one there knows John or his character I can pretty much make johns character whatever I decide it is. Those who then join into the discussion can then try to ask questions about Johns character which I will then answer with my own spin and opinion.</p><p> </p><p>This thread is basically a wasted exercise in speculation since the folks who made the decision are not here to defend that decision. As such we are then forced to speculate on that decision based on whatever information John346 decides is important enough to share with us. We are then required to trust that the integrity of the person questioning the decisionmakers integrity is sound. </p><p> </p><p>As such we have now appeared to draw the lines between those who think we should loudly scream to the customer that we screwed them and those make the argument that the decision to call this a weather emergency may acually have been right one. Those who want to believe the worst here will do so simply because the questioning of someones moral character, the spin of corporate deciet, the hatred for the faceless corporate entity is too strong to ignore the opportunity to bash. </p><p> </p><p>The possible consequence to this exercise in speculation may very well be that customers will read this thread and think and believe the worst about us when the possibility is very realistic that the decision to use emergency conditions for a foggy weather event may have been the right one. </p><p> </p><p>Is this really an effort to hold the company accountable for "integrity" or a misguided effort to shoot the masters who make us toil so strenously.</p><p> </p><p>Does integrity require we ignore the impact of weather events in order to avoid any questions? Does the search for integrity require we make the ultimate sacrifice and throw ourselves on every grenade we see?</p><p> </p><p>If integrity is really the purpose with this thread then where is the integrity in firing off these half cocked accusations?</p><p> </p><p>Where is the integrity in this thread if the decisionmakers were actually right in this case and John346 was wrong? Will John now be able to go back to every customer who read this thread and correct his misinformation campaign?</p><p> </p><p>I know that the decision to use emergency conditions is not taken lightly. It requires many decisionmakers questioning and justifying the use of that code. I am therefore willing to throw a challenge out. Lets take this sanctimonious quest for integrity to a new level. Let UPS investigate the use of this code and if used erroneously then fire the decisionmakers who used it. If the decision was right then lets fire john for the damage he has done to our reputation here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tieguy, post: 787546, member: 1912"] To me this discussion is the same as if I went to some remote section of Argentina and started a debate about john346's moral character. Since no one there knows John or his character I can pretty much make johns character whatever I decide it is. Those who then join into the discussion can then try to ask questions about Johns character which I will then answer with my own spin and opinion. This thread is basically a wasted exercise in speculation since the folks who made the decision are not here to defend that decision. As such we are then forced to speculate on that decision based on whatever information John346 decides is important enough to share with us. We are then required to trust that the integrity of the person questioning the decisionmakers integrity is sound. As such we have now appeared to draw the lines between those who think we should loudly scream to the customer that we screwed them and those make the argument that the decision to call this a weather emergency may acually have been right one. Those who want to believe the worst here will do so simply because the questioning of someones moral character, the spin of corporate deciet, the hatred for the faceless corporate entity is too strong to ignore the opportunity to bash. The possible consequence to this exercise in speculation may very well be that customers will read this thread and think and believe the worst about us when the possibility is very realistic that the decision to use emergency conditions for a foggy weather event may have been the right one. Is this really an effort to hold the company accountable for "integrity" or a misguided effort to shoot the masters who make us toil so strenously. Does integrity require we ignore the impact of weather events in order to avoid any questions? Does the search for integrity require we make the ultimate sacrifice and throw ourselves on every grenade we see? If integrity is really the purpose with this thread then where is the integrity in firing off these half cocked accusations? Where is the integrity in this thread if the decisionmakers were actually right in this case and John346 was wrong? Will John now be able to go back to every customer who read this thread and correct his misinformation campaign? I know that the decision to use emergency conditions is not taken lightly. It requires many decisionmakers questioning and justifying the use of that code. I am therefore willing to throw a challenge out. Lets take this sanctimonious quest for integrity to a new level. Let UPS investigate the use of this code and if used erroneously then fire the decisionmakers who used it. If the decision was right then lets fire john for the damage he has done to our reputation here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Integrity issues?
Top