Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Interesting Conversation While Siting in My Broken Down Package Car
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Griff" data-source="post: 846657" data-attributes="member: 7111"><p>So you are in favor of preferential treatment and therefore biased discipline in the workplace? The examples you have cited in your post comparing to the OP's experience are absolutely insane. Judging by your entire post is it safe to say that someone who follows the methods and the contract should be fired for the same offense as someone who skips their lunch and runs all day for the company? The contract and method driver is always viewed by management to be "uncooperative" and a "troublemaker". The OP wasn't being a jerk, he's doing HIS job and covering his behind. If he takes it upon himself to start tampering with a UPS vehicle and something goes wrong the company will try to hold him accountable for anything he has done. He isn't a professional mechanic and he shouldn't have to assume responsibility for a $70,000+ automobile owned by a Fortune 50 company. Do you have any idea how many supervisors run around saying "that's not my job." when one of us reports a problem everyday throughout America? </p><p></p><p>I can't wait till UPS fires me because it's management like you that is going to get this company burned at the stake in a courtroom. You cannot discipline two separate people differently for the same offense because of your petty and trivial biases about cooperation. Especially in the manner in which you suggested, that someone should be TERMINATED and the other should be given a warning. Wake up and smell the ego trip, what you are saying is illegal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Griff, post: 846657, member: 7111"] So you are in favor of preferential treatment and therefore biased discipline in the workplace? The examples you have cited in your post comparing to the OP's experience are absolutely insane. Judging by your entire post is it safe to say that someone who follows the methods and the contract should be fired for the same offense as someone who skips their lunch and runs all day for the company? The contract and method driver is always viewed by management to be "uncooperative" and a "troublemaker". The OP wasn't being a jerk, he's doing HIS job and covering his behind. If he takes it upon himself to start tampering with a UPS vehicle and something goes wrong the company will try to hold him accountable for anything he has done. He isn't a professional mechanic and he shouldn't have to assume responsibility for a $70,000+ automobile owned by a Fortune 50 company. Do you have any idea how many supervisors run around saying "that's not my job." when one of us reports a problem everyday throughout America? I can't wait till UPS fires me because it's management like you that is going to get this company burned at the stake in a courtroom. You cannot discipline two separate people differently for the same offense because of your petty and trivial biases about cooperation. Especially in the manner in which you suggested, that someone should be TERMINATED and the other should be given a warning. Wake up and smell the ego trip, what you are saying is illegal. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Interesting Conversation While Siting in My Broken Down Package Car
Top