Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Iran soon to get the BIG BOMB!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 156122" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Link to article in March of 2003' discussing this very issue of whether directly or indirectly said by Bush.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0314/p02s01-woiq.html" target="_blank">The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq | csmonitor.com</a></p><p> </p><p>Transcription of March 2003' President Bush Press Conference article above spoke of. Read it and decide for yourself.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030306-8.html" target="_blank">President George Bush Discusses Iraq in National Press Conference</a></p><p> </p><p>Only thing I would point out is that just after 9/11 only 3% believe Iraq linked to event. In March of 03' that number depending on poll taken was upwards towards 50%. Somebody was surely suggesting to the American public this was the case as polls indicated so who would have the motive to have the public thinking in that way?</p><p> </p><p>In Sept. 2003' you would now see this.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3118262.stm" target="_blank">BBC NEWS | Americas | Bush rejects Saddam 9/11 link</a></p><p> </p><p>What had already happened from March of 03' to Sept. 03' that any suggestion of a link would need to be addressed publically to now dispell? Why not dispell it back in March of 03' after the polls were showing so many Americans were in fact believing the Iraq to 9/11 link?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 156122, member: 2189"] Link to article in March of 2003' discussing this very issue of whether directly or indirectly said by Bush. [url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0314/p02s01-woiq.html]The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq | csmonitor.com[/url] Transcription of March 2003' President Bush Press Conference article above spoke of. Read it and decide for yourself. [url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030306-8.html]President George Bush Discusses Iraq in National Press Conference[/url] Only thing I would point out is that just after 9/11 only 3% believe Iraq linked to event. In March of 03' that number depending on poll taken was upwards towards 50%. Somebody was surely suggesting to the American public this was the case as polls indicated so who would have the motive to have the public thinking in that way? In Sept. 2003' you would now see this. [url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3118262.stm]BBC NEWS | Americas | Bush rejects Saddam 9/11 link[/url] What had already happened from March of 03' to Sept. 03' that any suggestion of a link would need to be addressed publically to now dispell? Why not dispell it back in March of 03' after the polls were showing so many Americans were in fact believing the Iraq to 9/11 link? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Iran soon to get the BIG BOMB!
Top