Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Brownslave688" data-source="post: 5068130" data-attributes="member: 34439">Exhibit 1,098,987 that your reading comprehension is terrible. Or maybe as[USER=16501]@Re-Raise[/USER] pointed out you have no idea how conversation works.I’ll break it down to you.I said that I thought their pension topped out. Implying after so many years/age you could continue working but not gain anything on your pension payoutOk? Following?[USER=16501]@Re-Raise[/USER] responded with the above statement.This seems to be where you lost track&nbsp; so pay close attention. 30 years is considered common retirement length maybe now more people sticking around up to 35 but not longer very often. It would be expected that if a pension topped out it would be at that 30-35 year mark. Because of this it would be surprising to find someone still working beyond pension top out since they wouldn’t be adding anything to their pension.Ok? No? If not I don’t think I can help anymore.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Brownslave688, post: 5068130, member: 34439"] Exhibit 1,098,987 that your reading comprehension is terrible. Or maybe as[USER=16501]@Re-Raise[/USER] pointed out you have no idea how conversation works. I’ll break it down to you. I said that I thought their pension topped out. Implying after so many years/age you could continue working but not gain anything on your pension payout Ok? Following? [USER=16501]@Re-Raise[/USER] responded with the above statement. This seems to be where you lost track so pay close attention. 30 years is considered common retirement length maybe now more people sticking around up to 35 but not longer very often. It would be expected that if a pension topped out it would be at that 30-35 year mark. Because of this it would be surprising to find someone still working beyond pension top out since they wouldn’t be adding anything to their pension. Ok? No? If not I don’t think I can help anymore. [/QUOTE]

Verification