Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Jonfrum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RockyRogue" data-source="post: 223895" data-attributes="member: 7185"><p><span style="color: black">Red is a very reasonable individual, Tie. No doubt about that whatsoever. However, the "Benedict Arnold" comment can be traced back to what Area 43 said <em>later</em> about having a great working relationship with management i.e. communication, etc. Red's just a very confrontational, "not gonna give an <em>inch</em> to this tie!," kinda fellow. And there's nothing wrong with that, Red. We all have different approaches to dealing with management. I have mine, Area43 has his and you have yours. All seem to work to a greater or lesser extent. </span></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Mystique? Yes. But, Area43 made a great point about ethics here, Tie. I'm siding with Area43's argument for Jon's conduct lacking ethical considerations. Then again, I'm known for seeing ethical issues in black and white, not shades of gray. While Jon's information is interesting--never said it wasn't, Cole and Co.--it <em>probably</em> is bordering on internal memoranda. As Cheryl hasn't stopped the posts, I'm going to assume UPS doesn't have a problem with the information being publicized. However......I'm still having an ethical problem with Jon obtaining the information in the first place. -Rocky</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RockyRogue, post: 223895, member: 7185"] [COLOR=black]Red is a very reasonable individual, Tie. No doubt about that whatsoever. However, the "Benedict Arnold" comment can be traced back to what Area 43 said [I]later[/I] about having a great working relationship with management i.e. communication, etc. Red's just a very confrontational, "not gonna give an [I]inch[/I] to this tie!," kinda fellow. And there's nothing wrong with that, Red. We all have different approaches to dealing with management. I have mine, Area43 has his and you have yours. All seem to work to a greater or lesser extent. [/COLOR] [COLOR=blue][/COLOR] Mystique? Yes. But, Area43 made a great point about ethics here, Tie. I'm siding with Area43's argument for Jon's conduct lacking ethical considerations. Then again, I'm known for seeing ethical issues in black and white, not shades of gray. While Jon's information is interesting--never said it wasn't, Cole and Co.--it [I]probably[/I] is bordering on internal memoranda. As Cheryl hasn't stopped the posts, I'm going to assume UPS doesn't have a problem with the information being publicized. However......I'm still having an ethical problem with Jon obtaining the information in the first place. -Rocky [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Jonfrum
Top