Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Let’s be serious for a sec
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrownRecycler" data-source="post: 3662002" data-attributes="member: 73454"><p>I feel the "Top 10 Reasons To Vote No" is mostly about driver and less about package handler. How is more money is going to solve the new contract problem? It isn't just about the driver. It is about everyone. Granted, everyone have lot of "pragmatic" languages to insert into the contract. When voting, you are voting on behalf of contract AS-IS and your own interest as for other.</p><p></p><p>But.... no matters how you vote, someone is going to lose and am not talking about UPS corporate. Another words, someone is going to get hurt in the contract deal either way. The numbers are the key when voting. Please don't make it just about driver.</p><p></p><p>Pawn (package handler)</p><p>Knight (driver)</p><p>Rook (forklift/adv loader)</p><p>Bishop (supervisor)</p><p>Queen (manager)</p><p>King (executive of UPS)</p><p></p><p>Everyone is together. And, if you make more money, it probably motivate you more to install multiple clauses. The question, who are you installing the clause for? The driver or everyone?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrownRecycler, post: 3662002, member: 73454"] I feel the "Top 10 Reasons To Vote No" is mostly about driver and less about package handler. How is more money is going to solve the new contract problem? It isn't just about the driver. It is about everyone. Granted, everyone have lot of "pragmatic" languages to insert into the contract. When voting, you are voting on behalf of contract AS-IS and your own interest as for other. But.... no matters how you vote, someone is going to lose and am not talking about UPS corporate. Another words, someone is going to get hurt in the contract deal either way. The numbers are the key when voting. Please don't make it just about driver. Pawn (package handler) Knight (driver) Rook (forklift/adv loader) Bishop (supervisor) Queen (manager) King (executive of UPS) Everyone is together. And, if you make more money, it probably motivate you more to install multiple clauses. The question, who are you installing the clause for? The driver or everyone? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Let’s be serious for a sec
Top