Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="El Correcto" data-source="post: 4598196" data-attributes="member: 60631">I can accept that point of view, about the constitution. I’ve argued it but better than you because your version is stupid and based on your delusions of god. Mine was based on a libertarian perspective of freedom of association.The only right you have against gays is your freedom of association, which got over ruled during the civil rights act with interstate commerce clause dictating state businesses(you must not be pro civil rights acts) and your freedom of religion, which is on shaky ground when it doesn’t involve your church as seen with the newest court ruling tying sexuality to the “sex” with the civil rights act.You can keep seething though boomer, I really see nothing to gain by even discussing this with you and I don’t feel like derailing this thread because you hate homos.If you want to have a late night homo session go to the lgbt thread, where this conversation belongs.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="El Correcto, post: 4598196, member: 60631"] I can accept that point of view, about the constitution. I’ve argued it but better than you because your version is stupid and based on your delusions of god. Mine was based on a libertarian perspective of freedom of association. The only right you have against gays is your freedom of association, which got over ruled during the civil rights act with interstate commerce clause dictating state businesses(you must not be pro civil rights acts) and your freedom of religion, which is on shaky ground when it doesn’t involve your church as seen with the newest court ruling tying sexuality to the “sex” with the civil rights act. You can keep seething though boomer, I really see nothing to gain by even discussing this with you and I don’t feel like derailing this thread because you hate homos. If you want to have a late night homo session go to the lgbt thread, where this conversation belongs. [/QUOTE]

Verification