Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 104 refuses to cooperate with the Department of Labor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="twoweeled" data-source="post: 2948622" data-attributes="member: 27108"><p>I retired after 2014. I don't totally understand the differences with that whole thing. Some drivers made a point of retiring before, while others chose to retire after. Speaking to some prior 2014, there doesn't seem to be any certain differences I can nail.</p><p>Personally, I cannot believe anything is off the table at negotiation time. To believe that, I'd have to believe UPS just wanted to take care of retirees with excellent coverage for $50 month premium - then after many years, decided they didn't care anymore. $50 to $300 month for less coverage in 3 years. Just doesn't make sense at a quick glance.</p><p>I'll make it, in spite of this, but it's very aggravating in principle what took place. Really, it is the principle. We also did it with wage progression. We do it with new hires.We're being divided. We shot ourselves in the foot. Just my opinion</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="twoweeled, post: 2948622, member: 27108"] I retired after 2014. I don't totally understand the differences with that whole thing. Some drivers made a point of retiring before, while others chose to retire after. Speaking to some prior 2014, there doesn't seem to be any certain differences I can nail. Personally, I cannot believe anything is off the table at negotiation time. To believe that, I'd have to believe UPS just wanted to take care of retirees with excellent coverage for $50 month premium - then after many years, decided they didn't care anymore. $50 to $300 month for less coverage in 3 years. Just doesn't make sense at a quick glance. I'll make it, in spite of this, but it's very aggravating in principle what took place. Really, it is the principle. We also did it with wage progression. We do it with new hires.We're being divided. We shot ourselves in the foot. Just my opinion [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 104 refuses to cooperate with the Department of Labor
Top