Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 177 Election
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tieguy" data-source="post: 716552" data-attributes="member: 1912"><p><span style="color: #0000ff">I'm sure voting more then once would be sop in your local.<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/laughing.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":laughing:" title="Laughing :laughing:" data-shortname=":laughing:" /></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">I noticed in your listing that 177 had a lot of cases on the slates that were deadlocked. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">In that case I would imagine the pro slate would say they were holding the company accountable</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">while the against slate would say they were pissing the members money away chasing grievances that have no prayer of winning.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">It seems to me that any union slate could send the message they were tough on the company by sending a lot of cases to the panel.</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">the question though is this the best solution for the members. I've heard of locals over the year that got theirselves into a bind because they ran cash poor chasing all those panel cases. </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tieguy, post: 716552, member: 1912"] [COLOR=#0000ff]I'm sure voting more then once would be sop in your local.:laughing:[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]I noticed in your listing that 177 had a lot of cases on the slates that were deadlocked. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]In that case I would imagine the pro slate would say they were holding the company accountable[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]while the against slate would say they were pissing the members money away chasing grievances that have no prayer of winning.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]It seems to me that any union slate could send the message they were tough on the company by sending a lot of cases to the panel.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]the question though is this the best solution for the members. I've heard of locals over the year that got theirselves into a bind because they ran cash poor chasing all those panel cases. [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 177 Election
Top