Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 243
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Inthegame" data-source="post: 3942115" data-attributes="member: 37112"><p>You do understand charges must be filed (by a member) concerning this alleged transgression to start the process? </p><p>Has that been done? </p><p>Otherwise, only the IRB, now IIO, has the constitutional ability to skip this step. </p><p>Has that body been notified?</p><p>"Exposing" old news on BC might be good politics but won't get the investigation you supposedly seek.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Inthegame, post: 3942115, member: 37112"] You do understand charges must be filed (by a member) concerning this alleged transgression to start the process? Has that been done? Otherwise, only the IRB, now IIO, has the constitutional ability to skip this step. Has that body been notified? "Exposing" old news on BC might be good politics but won't get the investigation you supposedly seek. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 243
Top