Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 243
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Inthegame" data-source="post: 3943397" data-attributes="member: 37112"><p>Nothing new here, a few large locals have always changed leadership occasionally. L804 is a prime example. A misfit group replaced the reform group in office. Now the misfits are out and a combo group of past reformers and a few new inexperienced actors are in. In any case, there's going to be a rocky road ahead and guess who suffers?</p><p>Whether there was any misconduct on BRF's part, RA was responsible for <strong>his</strong> behavior. You continue to ignore that pertinent fact. No one else got <strong>him</strong> fired. <strong>His</strong> behavior is the reason he's not working at UPS.</p><p>Addressed in a prior post. Were charges, by any member of her local, brought forth? Until that happens, you're just farting in the wind.</p><p>So much for courageous members, or maybe L538 members are satisfied with the status quo.</p><p>Either way, how can one expect new leaders to negotiate successful contracts if they can't muster up the nerve to run in a local election?</p><p>Glad we're finally back to L243. So did the Teamsters fire this challenger or UPS? Why don't you enlighten us on the details of this transgression rather than rehash the RA saga, which has no connection to L243.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Inthegame, post: 3943397, member: 37112"] Nothing new here, a few large locals have always changed leadership occasionally. L804 is a prime example. A misfit group replaced the reform group in office. Now the misfits are out and a combo group of past reformers and a few new inexperienced actors are in. In any case, there's going to be a rocky road ahead and guess who suffers? Whether there was any misconduct on BRF's part, RA was responsible for [B]his[/B] behavior. You continue to ignore that pertinent fact. No one else got [B]him[/B] fired. [B]His[/B] behavior is the reason he's not working at UPS. Addressed in a prior post. Were charges, by any member of her local, brought forth? Until that happens, you're just farting in the wind. So much for courageous members, or maybe L538 members are satisfied with the status quo. Either way, how can one expect new leaders to negotiate successful contracts if they can't muster up the nerve to run in a local election? Glad we're finally back to L243. So did the Teamsters fire this challenger or UPS? Why don't you enlighten us on the details of this transgression rather than rehash the RA saga, which has no connection to L243. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 243
Top