Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 243
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="browned out" data-source="post: 3944490" data-attributes="member: 8105"><p>Whether there was any misconduct on BRF's part, RA was responsible for <strong>his</strong> behavior. You continue to ignore that pertinent fact. No one else got <strong>him</strong> fired. <strong>His</strong> behavior is the reason he's not working at UPS.</p><p></p><p>Let's not be naive. RA's behavior was minor methods violations. He was targeted by the Union and UPS then terminated. A Runners methods violations are more serious and more dangerous but UPS looks the other way....constantly.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Addressed in a prior post. Were charges, by any member of her local, brought forth? Until that happens, you're just farting in the wind.</p><p></p><p>Charges could not be filed as RA was no longer a Teamster</p><p></p><p></p><p>Glad we're finally back to L243. So did the Teamsters fire this challenger or UPS? Why don't you enlighten us on the details of this transgression rather than rehash the RA saga, which has no connection to L243.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The Teamster Reps in 243 and more importantly, the Teamsters on the panel ignored UPS dishonesty re methods and procedures.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="browned out, post: 3944490, member: 8105"] Whether there was any misconduct on BRF's part, RA was responsible for [B]his[/B] behavior. You continue to ignore that pertinent fact. No one else got [B]him[/B] fired. [B]His[/B] behavior is the reason he's not working at UPS. Let's not be naive. RA's behavior was minor methods violations. He was targeted by the Union and UPS then terminated. A Runners methods violations are more serious and more dangerous but UPS looks the other way....constantly. Addressed in a prior post. Were charges, by any member of her local, brought forth? Until that happens, you're just farting in the wind. Charges could not be filed as RA was no longer a Teamster Glad we're finally back to L243. So did the Teamsters fire this challenger or UPS? Why don't you enlighten us on the details of this transgression rather than rehash the RA saga, which has no connection to L243. The Teamster Reps in 243 and more importantly, the Teamsters on the panel ignored UPS dishonesty re methods and procedures. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 243
Top