Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
LU 177 "selective" Seniority.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 2765644" data-attributes="member: 14176"><p>It's not fine or "fair", because the prior system was..."unfair".</p><p>The premise that one must back a bad decision (precedence) has been the demise of many riverboat gamblers....and it is an inherent weakness of our Union.</p><p></p><p>I'll take that bet, because as I said, I have no immediate plan to make a move.</p><p></p><p>In the end though, I'll bet that 23 year feeder driver wouldn't be willing to turn back the clock and trade places with me....</p><p></p><p>....which is often easily assumed by their body type, and because they already made that decision 23 years ago???</p><p></p><p>Taking the easy way out, often comes with a price?</p><p></p><p>So would I, but because it wouldn't be "equitable" for the majority, not because I'm worried about a select few...or myself.</p><p></p><p>Thankfully, the vast majority of the Central Region already has it right.</p><p>Hopefully the rest of the country will wake up and follow suit?</p><p></p><p>We aren't talking about other "union shops", we are talking about UPS, who operates under the premise of a National Master, but operates with "inequitable" autonomy.</p><p></p><p>I propose we tighten up our game?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 2765644, member: 14176"] It's not fine or "fair", because the prior system was..."unfair". The premise that one must back a bad decision (precedence) has been the demise of many riverboat gamblers....and it is an inherent weakness of our Union. I'll take that bet, because as I said, I have no immediate plan to make a move. In the end though, I'll bet that 23 year feeder driver wouldn't be willing to turn back the clock and trade places with me.... ....which is often easily assumed by their body type, and because they already made that decision 23 years ago??? Taking the easy way out, often comes with a price? So would I, but because it wouldn't be "equitable" for the majority, not because I'm worried about a select few...or myself. Thankfully, the vast majority of the Central Region already has it right. Hopefully the rest of the country will wake up and follow suit? We aren't talking about other "union shops", we are talking about UPS, who operates under the premise of a National Master, but operates with "inequitable" autonomy. I propose we tighten up our game? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
LU 177 "selective" Seniority.
Top