Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
lunch in Diad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brown287" data-source="post: 1088289" data-attributes="member: 14940"><p>The lawsuit was not for lunch. It was for the third break and second lunch rule. In fact every employer is under the same requirement for lunch in California. However they overturned the law stating that it is not the employers responsibility to enforce the lunch law. That's why they no longer check. Try not taking your lunch on Monday and see yourself. They only look at breaks and the hour verses the thirty minute lunch in relation to our plan days. So please understand that the lawsuit and lunch enforcement having no coronation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brown287, post: 1088289, member: 14940"] The lawsuit was not for lunch. It was for the third break and second lunch rule. In fact every employer is under the same requirement for lunch in California. However they overturned the law stating that it is not the employers responsibility to enforce the lunch law. That's why they no longer check. Try not taking your lunch on Monday and see yourself. They only look at breaks and the hour verses the thirty minute lunch in relation to our plan days. So please understand that the lawsuit and lunch enforcement having no coronation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
lunch in Diad
Top