Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Maybe now is the right time to organize
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dmac1" data-source="post: 4617838" data-attributes="member: 60252"><p>The fake Christian speaks. Yet says nothing true. The ACA expanded coverage by limiting total out of pocket, requiring coverage of pre-existing conditions, stopping annual and lifetime limits on care, Even employer plans are required to offer all those, plus the ten essential benefits at no added out of pocket costs. You saying the coverage worse is not true- it is a lie, making you a liar. It is impossible that you had better coverage before. You don't even know what better coverage means. You seem to think the 20% co-insurance after your annual deductible is better somehow than a strict annual cap on total expense upfront. I bet you can't even explain 'co-insurance' and how it relates to your annual deductible, and how it changed under the ACA. I bet you can't state all the essentail services that you would have paid a copay of deductible for under prior plans that are at zero added out of pocket under the ACA. And even insurance under employer plans were required to make those changes. Under the ACA, people are encouraged to use preventative care rather than discouraged due to copays and deductibles on the basics. You clearly are uneducated on the matter because you believe anything your leaders tell you. </p><p></p><p>Most ignorant of all was your claim that people could get emergency care, which they still can. but you ignore that chronic care issues were not covered by hospitals in the ER. Under the ACA, low income people could get blood pressure medication for nothing out of pocket or diabetes medication instead of needing to go to the ER for a foot amputation or a heart attack.</p><p></p><p>You did NOT have B\better coverage at a lower price. That is a lie. You may have had lower premiums, but even that doesn't mean lower total annual out of pocket costs, and in an emergency needing surgery, and many days of hospital care, you are definitely better off under the ACA.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dmac1, post: 4617838, member: 60252"] The fake Christian speaks. Yet says nothing true. The ACA expanded coverage by limiting total out of pocket, requiring coverage of pre-existing conditions, stopping annual and lifetime limits on care, Even employer plans are required to offer all those, plus the ten essential benefits at no added out of pocket costs. You saying the coverage worse is not true- it is a lie, making you a liar. It is impossible that you had better coverage before. You don't even know what better coverage means. You seem to think the 20% co-insurance after your annual deductible is better somehow than a strict annual cap on total expense upfront. I bet you can't even explain 'co-insurance' and how it relates to your annual deductible, and how it changed under the ACA. I bet you can't state all the essentail services that you would have paid a copay of deductible for under prior plans that are at zero added out of pocket under the ACA. And even insurance under employer plans were required to make those changes. Under the ACA, people are encouraged to use preventative care rather than discouraged due to copays and deductibles on the basics. You clearly are uneducated on the matter because you believe anything your leaders tell you. Most ignorant of all was your claim that people could get emergency care, which they still can. but you ignore that chronic care issues were not covered by hospitals in the ER. Under the ACA, low income people could get blood pressure medication for nothing out of pocket or diabetes medication instead of needing to go to the ER for a foot amputation or a heart attack. You did NOT have B\better coverage at a lower price. That is a lie. You may have had lower premiums, but even that doesn't mean lower total annual out of pocket costs, and in an emergency needing surgery, and many days of hospital care, you are definitely better off under the ACA. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Maybe now is the right time to organize
Top