Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
UPS Subsidiaries
UPS Freight = TForce Freight
more questions for the apwa
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ironshot" data-source="post: 187034" data-attributes="member: 6881"><p>BigUnionguy,</p><p> You obviously haven't a clue as to the regs regarding the Dol and getting the "union" status. You have to have a body of members that signed cards giving the new organization authority to represent them. Once this is done the paper work can be filed with the Dol. To file before hand would be a violation. </p><p>Here is something else for you BigUnionGuy</p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px"><strong>Hoffa Takes Aim at Your Right to Vote</strong> </span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px"></span></strong>By TDU Created <strong>2007-03-05 </strong>20:33 </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Hoffa won the election and deserves to serve as our Teamster president. But he, and other top officers, should respect Teamster democracy and fair, supervised elections. Instead, they are working to make the 2006 Teamster election the last.<strong> </strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong></strong>In 2001, President Hoffa supported an amendment to the Teamster Constitution to establish members’ right to elect International Union officers and convention delegates. But today top Hoffa administration officials are publicly attacking Teamster elections. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">What explains the Hoffa administration’s U-turn and what can Teamsters do to protect our Right to Vote?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">In two recent union publications, <strong>International Vice President Fred Gegare </strong>and <strong>International</strong> <strong>Carhaul Director Fred Z </strong>opposed members’ Right to Vote and openly praised the old system where local union officials automatically served as convention delegates. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Gegare and Zuckerman each have their reasons for taking away members’ right to elect our convention delegates. Zuckerman was humiliated when Local 89 members defeated his slate and elected 17 rank-and-file delegates who supported Tom L. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>Gegare, </strong>the chairman of the <strong>Central States Fund </strong>who <strong>voted to cut members’ pensions </strong>(while having <strong>four pensions himself</strong>) knows that rank-and-file delegates were the main supporters of amendments to hold pension fund trustees accountable to Teamster members. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">But Gegare and Zuckerman are not launching free-lance attacks based on their personal agendas. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>L Ghostwrites Articles</strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">The articles in the Wisconsin Teamster and the Local 89 Teamster were signed by <strong>Gegare</strong> and <strong>Zuckerman</strong>, but were actually written by Richard L, a top advisor to President Hoffa and his chief spokesperson during the 2006 election. That explains how two officials in different states use the exact same words in their “personal” columns. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">It’s all part of a Hoffa administration effort to maintain elections for IBT officers in the constitution, but eliminate the Right to Vote in practice. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Hoffa can’t come out against Teamster democracy directly. He needs to be able to tell the Justice Department that Teamsters have the Right to Vote in our constitution to be successful in negotiations with the Justice Department to end the Consent Decree and government oversight of our union. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>Hoffa’s U-Turn</strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">So Hoffa champions the Right to Vote as a constitutional principle, while he fights any attempts by members to exercise their Right to Vote in practice.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">In 2006, Hoffa tried to block the nomination of all opposition candidates and his campaign repeatedly denounced his opponents for “wasting our union’s money” by running for office. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Top Hoffa administration officials have repeatedly gone on the record in support of a change to the election rules to increase the amount of delegate support that candidates would need to get on the ballot. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Hoffa’s own spokesman has put it in writing that Teamster members should lose the right to elect Convention delegates. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Hoffa’s plan is clear. Change the nomination formula. Eliminate elected delegates. And presto! Members would still have the constitutional Right to Vote for International Union officers, but it would be impossible for any opposition candidates to run. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Hoffa won the election and deserves to serve as our Teamster president. But he, and other top officers, should respect Teamster democracy and fair, supervised elections. Instead, they are working to make the 2006 Teamster election the last.</span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">These elitist in the IBT don't give a rats behind about you rank and file members. They are set for life already. You're a useful idiot at best in there eyes. The article says it all, you're not smart enough to vote, "we" know what is best for you! "We" don't need to be explaining ourselves to you! That is the face of the IBT.</span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ironshot, post: 187034, member: 6881"] BigUnionguy, You obviously haven't a clue as to the regs regarding the Dol and getting the "union" status. You have to have a body of members that signed cards giving the new organization authority to represent them. Once this is done the paper work can be filed with the Dol. To file before hand would be a violation. Here is something else for you BigUnionGuy [B][SIZE=5][B]Hoffa Takes Aim at Your Right to Vote[/B] [/SIZE][/B][SIZE=5][/SIZE]By TDU Created [B]2007-03-05 [/B]20:33 [SIZE=3]Hoffa won the election and deserves to serve as our Teamster president. But he, and other top officers, should respect Teamster democracy and fair, supervised elections. Instead, they are working to make the 2006 Teamster election the last.[B] [/B]In 2001, President Hoffa supported an amendment to the Teamster Constitution to establish members’ right to elect International Union officers and convention delegates. But today top Hoffa administration officials are publicly attacking Teamster elections. What explains the Hoffa administration’s U-turn and what can Teamsters do to protect our Right to Vote? In two recent union publications, [B]International Vice President Fred Gegare [/B]and [B]International[/B] [B]Carhaul Director Fred Z [/B]opposed members’ Right to Vote and openly praised the old system where local union officials automatically served as convention delegates. Gegare and Zuckerman each have their reasons for taking away members’ right to elect our convention delegates. Zuckerman was humiliated when Local 89 members defeated his slate and elected 17 rank-and-file delegates who supported Tom L. [B]Gegare, [/B]the chairman of the [B]Central States Fund [/B]who [B]voted to cut members’ pensions [/B](while having [B]four pensions himself[/B]) knows that rank-and-file delegates were the main supporters of amendments to hold pension fund trustees accountable to Teamster members. But Gegare and Zuckerman are not launching free-lance attacks based on their personal agendas. [B]L Ghostwrites Articles[/B] The articles in the Wisconsin Teamster and the Local 89 Teamster were signed by [B]Gegare[/B] and [B]Zuckerman[/B], but were actually written by Richard L, a top advisor to President Hoffa and his chief spokesperson during the 2006 election. That explains how two officials in different states use the exact same words in their “personal” columns. It’s all part of a Hoffa administration effort to maintain elections for IBT officers in the constitution, but eliminate the Right to Vote in practice. Hoffa can’t come out against Teamster democracy directly. He needs to be able to tell the Justice Department that Teamsters have the Right to Vote in our constitution to be successful in negotiations with the Justice Department to end the Consent Decree and government oversight of our union. [B]Hoffa’s U-Turn[/B] So Hoffa champions the Right to Vote as a constitutional principle, while he fights any attempts by members to exercise their Right to Vote in practice. In 2006, Hoffa tried to block the nomination of all opposition candidates and his campaign repeatedly denounced his opponents for “wasting our union’s money” by running for office. Top Hoffa administration officials have repeatedly gone on the record in support of a change to the election rules to increase the amount of delegate support that candidates would need to get on the ballot. Hoffa’s own spokesman has put it in writing that Teamster members should lose the right to elect Convention delegates. Hoffa’s plan is clear. Change the nomination formula. Eliminate elected delegates. And presto! Members would still have the constitutional Right to Vote for International Union officers, but it would be impossible for any opposition candidates to run. Hoffa won the election and deserves to serve as our Teamster president. But he, and other top officers, should respect Teamster democracy and fair, supervised elections. Instead, they are working to make the 2006 Teamster election the last. These elitist in the IBT don't give a rats behind about you rank and file members. They are set for life already. You're a useful idiot at best in there eyes. The article says it all, you're not smart enough to vote, "we" know what is best for you! "We" don't need to be explaining ourselves to you! That is the face of the IBT. [/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
UPS Subsidiaries
UPS Freight = TForce Freight
more questions for the apwa
Top