Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
New branding!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Exec32" data-source="post: 2332432" data-attributes="member: 56206"><p>You do know clearly then that the evasive tactics by X are well known now.</p><p>X was flying under the radar for years before the public media storm.</p><p>X has been exposed, and regulatory agencies including Congress and the public in general will no longer turn a blind eye to X raping the economy only to gain a competitive edge at the expense of everyone.</p><p>Sounds far fetched? Possibly a few years ago, but other corporations have caught on and jumped on the X model bandwagon only to run into lawsuits in a relatively short period of time.</p><p>The cards are stacked against them. ISP is not and will not be their savior. It still flies in the face of the legal and regulatory laws and rules already on the book.</p><p>Hard to get over that economic dependence when each and every entity contracted with Fedex was set up to serve X, and ONL X. </p><p>If X provided packages for me to receive wwhatever time I wanted, released the packages to me, allowed me to use whatever company resources I see fit,, hire when and who I want using my own process, scan with my choice of scanner, purchase any required equipment from my choice of vendor, ship any other companies product on my trucks with theirs, and go to my company website only for contacts/memos/and changes, then I will completely agree with you that the future is ISP. </p><p>SIMPLY PUT, I only need to see X once a year to either sign another contract, or if they don't like my services end it before hand. Last, every ISP WOULD have to show they are not ECONOMICALLY DEPENDENT on fedex by serving other clients raising a sizable income elsewhere.</p><p>And by the way for those of you that would like to point out that X requires all this Controll because we use their DOT #. </p><p>I say X intentionally does that to exert control under the guise of the FMCSA. The model they seek would require, no demand that we have our own DOT, the increased expense would reflect in OUR increased charges to X.</p><p>NOT ONE OF YOU ON THIS ENTIRE FORUM CAN SOLVE THIS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Exec32, post: 2332432, member: 56206"] You do know clearly then that the evasive tactics by X are well known now. X was flying under the radar for years before the public media storm. X has been exposed, and regulatory agencies including Congress and the public in general will no longer turn a blind eye to X raping the economy only to gain a competitive edge at the expense of everyone. Sounds far fetched? Possibly a few years ago, but other corporations have caught on and jumped on the X model bandwagon only to run into lawsuits in a relatively short period of time. The cards are stacked against them. ISP is not and will not be their savior. It still flies in the face of the legal and regulatory laws and rules already on the book. Hard to get over that economic dependence when each and every entity contracted with Fedex was set up to serve X, and ONL X. If X provided packages for me to receive wwhatever time I wanted, released the packages to me, allowed me to use whatever company resources I see fit,, hire when and who I want using my own process, scan with my choice of scanner, purchase any required equipment from my choice of vendor, ship any other companies product on my trucks with theirs, and go to my company website only for contacts/memos/and changes, then I will completely agree with you that the future is ISP. SIMPLY PUT, I only need to see X once a year to either sign another contract, or if they don't like my services end it before hand. Last, every ISP WOULD have to show they are not ECONOMICALLY DEPENDENT on fedex by serving other clients raising a sizable income elsewhere. And by the way for those of you that would like to point out that X requires all this Controll because we use their DOT #. I say X intentionally does that to exert control under the guise of the FMCSA. The model they seek would require, no demand that we have our own DOT, the increased expense would reflect in OUR increased charges to X. NOT ONE OF YOU ON THIS ENTIRE FORUM CAN SOLVE THIS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
New branding!
Top
