Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
New tdu article on halt to ratification
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 3771931" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>It doesn't mention an offer being rejected. It's just establishing that an agreement that has been passed by a majority of voters will be binding on all included locals, which sets the stage for the next sentence about how locals can withdraw from a master agreement. I do agree that it confuses the matter by mentioning a master being passed by a majority. It might even be enough to create a challenge to the vote process, if the constitition didn't give the IBT a trump card by giving the president final say in all questions about the issue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 3771931, member: 63706"] It doesn't mention an offer being rejected. It's just establishing that an agreement that has been passed by a majority of voters will be binding on all included locals, which sets the stage for the next sentence about how locals can withdraw from a master agreement. I do agree that it confuses the matter by mentioning a master being passed by a majority. It might even be enough to create a challenge to the vote process, if the constitition didn't give the IBT a trump card by giving the president final say in all questions about the issue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
New tdu article on halt to ratification
Top