Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
New tdu article on halt to ratification
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 3778352" data-attributes="member: 63706"><p>I agree that under section 2(d) the only way a revote is allowed for is if a strike is called. The part that you are overlooking is that even though we failed to reject the TA, we did not fail to authorize a strike, since we had a separate vote on that. That is important because without strike authorization, the Union wouldn't have much leverage to get the company back to the table. According section 2(d), under those circumstances the Union is not <em>required</em> to do anything. They don't <em>have</em> to ratify, don't <em>have</em> to call a strike. They could revert to using section 2(b) if the company agreed to continue negotiations, which we know they did. Like I said, the path to continued negotiations is in there, leadership simply lacked the will to take it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 3778352, member: 63706"] I agree that under section 2(d) the only way a revote is allowed for is if a strike is called. The part that you are overlooking is that even though we failed to reject the TA, we did not fail to authorize a strike, since we had a separate vote on that. That is important because without strike authorization, the Union wouldn't have much leverage to get the company back to the table. According section 2(d), under those circumstances the Union is not [I]required[/I] to do anything. They don't [I]have[/I] to ratify, don't [I]have[/I] to call a strike. They could revert to using section 2(b) if the company agreed to continue negotiations, which we know they did. Like I said, the path to continued negotiations is in there, leadership simply lacked the will to take it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
New tdu article on halt to ratification
Top