Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
NLRB Violations Local 174
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Backlasher" data-source="post: 3972387" data-attributes="member: 6276"><p>He's got a good point. It did seem like a threat for work stoppage by voting no. That'sbiasedmanipulation. We've done it before and technically still doing it now, extension of last contract. A majority no vote did not mean a work stoppage and almost guaranteed an extension to the contract because it was so close to peak season. Neither the Union nor UPS had the right to manipulate the vote via threat. That's not a far bargaining tactic which we are protected on via the NLRB.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Backlasher, post: 3972387, member: 6276"] He's got a good point. It did seem like a threat for work stoppage by voting no. That'sbiasedmanipulation. We've done it before and technically still doing it now, extension of last contract. A majority no vote did not mean a work stoppage and almost guaranteed an extension to the contract because it was so close to peak season. Neither the Union nor UPS had the right to manipulate the vote via threat. That's not a far bargaining tactic which we are protected on via the NLRB. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
NLRB Violations Local 174
Top