I missed it entirely. Anyone know where I could watch it? Web episode, maybe?
I don't find it very comforting that 2 of Obama's picks for giving him advice was his wife & grandma.
I don't quite remember the question, but one of Obama's answers was that it was "above his payscale"........HUH?? Did I hear that right?
Clearly one can tell the difference between the two canidates besides their policies stances, but by the way they deliver their answers.....McCain seemed straightforward, rehearsed and practised, delivering POW stories designed to touch the soul, and somewhat blurted out short respones with not much true thought and convictions behind them. He seemed to be pandering to the audience more than to Mr Warren.
Obama seemed to be having a conversation with Mr Warren than pandering to the audience. Obama seems to give deeper more thought out responses, seemed to be walking on eggshells at times on sensitive issues e.g...pro choice question, due to a more pro-conservative christian crowd. But clearly thinks out his idea's and judgement on issues without rushing to conclusions that result in blowback.
The homerun was for Pastor Warren and the Saddleback church. Since all the hoopla of the book, The Purpose Driven Life, has died down, Warren and Saddleback have not been an item in the public eye. This debate pulled Warren and the church back into the center ring of the 3 ring circus that is American electoral politics and thus amped up the PR machine for Warren Inc.
Warren Inc. was able to one up the networks, the political parties and the various political operatives by bringing us what amounts to a type of "soft and gentler" debate even before the conventions themselves. Who sez Jesus doesn't sell in decadent and sinful America!
Warren also managed to get religion back in a kind of center position in American politics as for the last nearly 30 years it was made to appear (via a type Cris Angel illusionism) an exclusive domain of the republican party.
I have little use for Warren, Saddleback or organized religion for that matter but Warren and Saddleback IMHO came out the real winners in this deal. Hats off to a brillant move on their part.
Interesting how we can view things differently. Many of mccains answers were short and to the point. I view that as being delivered honestly. Obama seemed to try harder to convince us which is a trait I tend to associate with someone who is lying. Obama also at times has the appearance of a nervous twitch about him which I'm not comfortable with. Reminds of a junky or con man.
Obviously, we view these canidates with a bias opinion, but I stand by my original post. Obama IMO, thinks before he speaks.....thats why you might here a uhm or ah here and there, but he responds to a question or an issue with a complete thought thats in depth (kind of like one of wkmac's long post). I view one who responds before the question is finished as programed, rehearsed and spontaneous. And we can't afford a knee jerk reactionairy president.
knee jerk? Give me a break, I figure they have each answered every question at leat 10,000 times by now. Why would the man have to stutter and stammer this time. Why because he is regurgitating his rehersed answers while McCain answered them straight forward and to the point.
e.g...When McCain brought up his first marriage as one of his faults, he didn't expand and go into an essay-toric explaination, just a mere mention. Meanwhile Obama responds his faults in depth and with convictions. Excluding last night's Townhall meeting at Saddleback, you got to admit, McCain gets tongue tied at rally's and says things completely out of touch in interviews that are un-rehearsed that it makes for great sound bites for anti-McCain pundits to exploit. The problem is it happens alot for McCain lately. Poor lil' bugger, we ain't getting any younger. I think it's time we get him "Life Alert"...a necklace with a help button in case he falls down and can get up.....