Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Overmanagement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="over9five" data-source="post: 782675" data-attributes="member: 1401"><p>That was one thing I noticed after returning from an absence in Package. We used to have that same problem with multiple consignee addresses. One consignee would be closed, and they'd hold the whole building!</p><p> </p><p>It is sooo much better now. We can tell them what company is closed, and the system will only hold that company. As Upstate said, it is not done by suite but by company name. The only time it misses is when there is no company name on the package. I would say it is darn near 100% effective now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="over9five, post: 782675, member: 1401"] That was one thing I noticed after returning from an absence in Package. We used to have that same problem with multiple consignee addresses. One consignee would be closed, and they'd hold the whole building! It is sooo much better now. We can tell them what company is closed, and the system will only hold that company. As Upstate said, it is not done by suite but by company name. The only time it misses is when there is no company name on the package. I would say it is darn near 100% effective now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Overmanagement
Top