Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Permanent layoffs question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="542thruNthru" data-source="post: 5589813" data-attributes="member: 48491"><p>Lots of supps have this language and many people don't realize it. This is from the Western PA supp. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]429200[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Notice the "at the appropriate rate for the classification of work performed".</p><p></p><p>Granted this one is a little more complicated then others by the implementation of (B). But as you can see FT drivers could drop to their preload rate of pay which is below top rate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="542thruNthru, post: 5589813, member: 48491"] Lots of supps have this language and many people don't realize it. This is from the Western PA supp. [ATTACH type="full"]429200[/ATTACH] Notice the "at the appropriate rate for the classification of work performed". Granted this one is a little more complicated then others by the implementation of (B). But as you can see FT drivers could drop to their preload rate of pay which is below top rate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Permanent layoffs question
Top