Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Phoning before delivery
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SmithBarney" data-source="post: 2836214" data-attributes="member: 709"><p>Look its a condition of employment, just like FedEx requires you to wear black shoes to work there, if you don't you get sent home(or fired if you continue to not comply) it's something you agree to as a condition of employment.</p><p></p><p>Much the same way you agree that you/possessions/vehicle may be searched, as a condition of employment.</p><p></p><p>Believe me I want to agree with you, its a crappy deal but the more I read the more I learn.</p><p></p><p>Feel free to cite sources why you believe otherwise.</p><p></p><p>As for the 4th... you may want to read a bit more on it. But conditional employment would trump the 4th even if it applied</p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><em>"Public employees work for the government, so any action by a public employer is by definition a "state action" and subject to the Bill of Rights. For this reason, employees of any level of government have the constitutional right to be protected from unreasonable search and seizure as guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the U.S Constitution. <strong>However, the Constitution only applies to state action and not to the actions of private employers</strong>. Public-sector employees have greater protections against workplace searches from their employers than private-sector employees do."</em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><em><a href="http://work.chron.com/privatesector-vs-publicsector-workplace-searches-28187.html" target="_blank">Private-Sector Vs. Public-Sector Workplace Searches</a></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><em>"The law regarding employee searches involves a careful balancing of the employer’s right to manage his or her business and the privacy rights of employees. For example, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides protection for all persons against unreasonable search and seizure of their persons, homes, and personal property, and this doctrine applies when the employer is the government. <strong>However, most private employers are exempt from this doctrine"</strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><em><a href="http://theemployeeslawyer.com/blog/2013/09/the-limits-to-an-employers-search/" target="_blank">The Limits to an Employer’s Search</a></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SmithBarney, post: 2836214, member: 709"] Look its a condition of employment, just like FedEx requires you to wear black shoes to work there, if you don't you get sent home(or fired if you continue to not comply) it's something you agree to as a condition of employment. Much the same way you agree that you/possessions/vehicle may be searched, as a condition of employment. Believe me I want to agree with you, its a crappy deal but the more I read the more I learn. Feel free to cite sources why you believe otherwise. As for the 4th... you may want to read a bit more on it. But conditional employment would trump the 4th even if it applied [SIZE=3][I]"Public employees work for the government, so any action by a public employer is by definition a "state action" and subject to the Bill of Rights. For this reason, employees of any level of government have the constitutional right to be protected from unreasonable search and seizure as guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the U.S Constitution. [B]However, the Constitution only applies to state action and not to the actions of private employers[/B]. Public-sector employees have greater protections against workplace searches from their employers than private-sector employees do."[/I] [I][/I] [I][URL="http://work.chron.com/privatesector-vs-publicsector-workplace-searches-28187.html"]Private-Sector Vs. Public-Sector Workplace Searches[/URL][/I] [I][/I] [I]"The law regarding employee searches involves a careful balancing of the employer’s right to manage his or her business and the privacy rights of employees. For example, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides protection for all persons against unreasonable search and seizure of their persons, homes, and personal property, and this doctrine applies when the employer is the government. [B]However, most private employers are exempt from this doctrine"[/B][/I] [I][B][/B][/I] [I][URL="http://theemployeeslawyer.com/blog/2013/09/the-limits-to-an-employers-search/"]The Limits to an Employer’s Search[/URL][B][/B][/I] [I][/I][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Phoning before delivery
Top