Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mugarolla" data-source="post: 3353324" data-attributes="member: 8481">[USER=67305]@john chesney[/USER], [USER=14176]@Bubblehead[/USER] and [USER=4992]@BigUnionGuy[/USER] summed it up perfectly.You can respond to the point of order, usually in rebuttal, when it is your turn.The point of order needs ruled on, one way or another, before the case can even continue.The point of order could actually nullify your grievance.A quick example.You file a grievance for supervisors working. At the local hearing, the Company calls a point of order. The point of order is then heard.The Company&#039;s point of order was that your grievance was untimely. It was filed beyond the 5 day period required in the contract.The dates are verified and the point of order is upheld.Your grievance is thrown out and will not be heard. And it is untimely to file another one.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mugarolla, post: 3353324, member: 8481"] [USER=67305]@john chesney[/USER], [USER=14176]@Bubblehead[/USER] and [USER=4992]@BigUnionGuy[/USER] summed it up perfectly. You can respond to the point of order, usually in rebuttal, when it is your turn. The point of order needs ruled on, one way or another, before the case can even continue. The point of order could actually nullify your grievance. A quick example. You file a grievance for supervisors working. At the local hearing, the Company calls a point of order. The point of order is then heard. The Company's point of order was that your grievance was untimely. It was filed beyond the 5 day period required in the contract. The dates are verified and the point of order is upheld. Your grievance is thrown out and will not be heard. And it is untimely to file another one. [/QUOTE]

Verification