Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Point of order
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mugarolla" data-source="post: 3357521" data-attributes="member: 8481"><p>Me too.</p><p></p><p>I'll give you a real life example.</p><p></p><p>We were at the JAC for a discharge for a package driver for a serious accident.</p><p></p><p>After all the evidence was presented and during rebuttal, the Company asked the driver about all these accidents he has had and does he think he should be able to keep his job after 6 accidents in the past 10 years.</p><p></p><p>Thank you UPS. </p><p></p><p>The BA immediately called a point of order.</p><p></p><p>The Chairman asked what the point of order was. The BA said that the Company just went back beyond 9 months and tried to introduce evidence outside of protocol.</p><p></p><p>The Company's rebuttal to the point of order was that it points out his poor accident history and he should remain discharged because he now has had 7 accidents in the past 10 years.</p><p></p><p>The parties were excused from the conference room. We were called back 10 minutes later. </p><p></p><p>The Chairman said that the point of order was upheld, the Company violated procedure by bringing up and introducing evidence beyond 9 months.</p><p></p><p>The grievant was returned to work the following day.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mugarolla, post: 3357521, member: 8481"] Me too. I'll give you a real life example. We were at the JAC for a discharge for a package driver for a serious accident. After all the evidence was presented and during rebuttal, the Company asked the driver about all these accidents he has had and does he think he should be able to keep his job after 6 accidents in the past 10 years. Thank you UPS. The BA immediately called a point of order. The Chairman asked what the point of order was. The BA said that the Company just went back beyond 9 months and tried to introduce evidence outside of protocol. The Company's rebuttal to the point of order was that it points out his poor accident history and he should remain discharged because he now has had 7 accidents in the past 10 years. The parties were excused from the conference room. We were called back 10 minutes later. The Chairman said that the point of order was upheld, the Company violated procedure by bringing up and introducing evidence beyond 9 months. The grievant was returned to work the following day. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Point of order
Top