Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Populist Indeed!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="njdriver" data-source="post: 2677614" data-attributes="member: 4596"><p>Some other quotes by scientists:</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">"The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it in the</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but purely the</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">product of imagination." Albert Fleischmann. Witnesses Against</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Evolution by John Fred Meldau (Denver: Christian Victory Publishing,</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">1968), p. 13.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">“Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of fact.” Dr. T. N.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Tahmisian Evolution and the Emperor's New Clothes by N.J. Mitchell</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">(United Kingdom: Roydon Publications, 1983), title page.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">“[T]he theory suffers from grave defects, which are becoming more and</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">more apparent as time advances. It can no longer square with practical</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">scientific knowledge, nor does it suffice for our theoretical grasp of the</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">facts. No one can demonstrate that the limits of a species have ever</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">been passed. These are the Rubicons which evolutionists cannot</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">cross. Darwin ransacked other spheres of practical research work for</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">ideas, but his whole resulting scheme remains, to this day, foreign to</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">scientifically established zoology, since actual changes of species by</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">such means are still unknown.” Albert Fleischmann, "The Doctrine of</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Organic Evolution in the Light of Modern Research," Journal of the</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Transactions of the Victoria Institute 65 (1933): pp. 194-95, 205-6, 208-</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">9. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">"With the failure of these many efforts, science was left in the somewhat</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">embarrassing position of having to postulate theories of living origins</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">which it could not demonstrate. After having chided the theologian for</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">his reliance on myth and miracle, science found itself in the inevitable</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">position of having to create a mythology of its own: namely, the</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">assumption that what, after long effort could not prove to take place</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">today had, in truth, taken place in the primeval past." Loren Eisley, The</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Immense Journey (1957), p. 199.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">"If complex organisms ever did evolve from simpler ones, the process</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">took place contrary to the laws of nature, and must have involved what</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">may rightly be termed the miraculous." R.E.D. Clark, Victoria Institute</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">(1943), </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Not everyone sees evolution as settled science.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="njdriver, post: 2677614, member: 4596"] Some other quotes by scientists: [SIZE=4]"The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it in the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but purely the product of imagination." Albert Fleischmann. Witnesses Against Evolution by John Fred Meldau (Denver: Christian Victory Publishing, 1968), p. 13. “Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of fact.” Dr. T. N. Tahmisian Evolution and the Emperor's New Clothes by N.J. Mitchell (United Kingdom: Roydon Publications, 1983), title page. “[T]he theory suffers from grave defects, which are becoming more and more apparent as time advances. It can no longer square with practical scientific knowledge, nor does it suffice for our theoretical grasp of the facts. No one can demonstrate that the limits of a species have ever been passed. These are the Rubicons which evolutionists cannot cross. Darwin ransacked other spheres of practical research work for ideas, but his whole resulting scheme remains, to this day, foreign to scientifically established zoology, since actual changes of species by such means are still unknown.” Albert Fleischmann, "The Doctrine of Organic Evolution in the Light of Modern Research," Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute 65 (1933): pp. 194-95, 205-6, 208- 9. "With the failure of these many efforts, science was left in the somewhat embarrassing position of having to postulate theories of living origins which it could not demonstrate. After having chided the theologian for his reliance on myth and miracle, science found itself in the inevitable position of having to create a mythology of its own: namely, the assumption that what, after long effort could not prove to take place today had, in truth, taken place in the primeval past." Loren Eisley, The Immense Journey (1957), p. 199. "If complex organisms ever did evolve from simpler ones, the process took place contrary to the laws of nature, and must have involved what may rightly be termed the miraculous." R.E.D. Clark, Victoria Institute (1943), Not everyone sees evolution as settled science.[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Populist Indeed!
Top