Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Presidential debates!! 2012
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bbsam" data-source="post: 1043866" data-attributes="member: 22662"><p>So I just went back and watched that part of the debate and Obama claimed he called it an "act of terror". Romney pounced making sure it was "act of terror" that he called it. Candy confirmed Obama had used the phrase "act of terror". So it seems they were all in agreement--much to Mitt's chagrin. So if you want to defend Mitt's ability to make ridiculous assertions and leave them hanging there until (and if) he gets around to the transcript, then fine. But that doesn't make Mitt's misstep any less damaging.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bbsam, post: 1043866, member: 22662"] So I just went back and watched that part of the debate and Obama claimed he called it an "act of terror". Romney pounced making sure it was "act of terror" that he called it. Candy confirmed Obama had used the phrase "act of terror". So it seems they were all in agreement--much to Mitt's chagrin. So if you want to defend Mitt's ability to make ridiculous assertions and leave them hanging there until (and if) he gets around to the transcript, then fine. But that doesn't make Mitt's misstep any less damaging. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Presidential debates!! 2012
Top
