Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Pro-Gun / Hunting Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="susiedriver" data-source="post: 51771"><p>dBoy, </p><p>you said: </p><p><em>Try 950,000 to 2.5 million in three years. And for some reason many of them the old, women and children. People that were not combatants.</em> </p><p> </p><p>Can you cite a source for this that is reliable? The work of James Bacque has been largely discredited by legitimate historians, and his neo-Nazi revisionism seems to be what you are citing. The real figures seem to be in the tens of thousands(40-50), which is still too many. </p><p> </p><p>You want Russian casualties? More than anyone else; not a secret, 22 million, 7 million civilian. </p><p> </p><p>As far as my holocaust figures, those are widely accepted by most people. They are certainly not a quarter of that. </p><p> </p><p>I never said we were holding 'millions' of POWs today. We are holding thousands of 'enemy combatants', and apparently have refined our mistreatment of them. </p><p> </p><p>You see, dBoy, you consistently spout off 'facts' that have footing in reality. Like your fact in another thread that if two drivers marry, one has to resign. Total BS, and has been at least since the 1970's, like most of what you say. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>}</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="susiedriver, post: 51771"] dBoy, you said: [i]Try 950,000 to 2.5 million in three years. And for some reason many of them the old, women and children. People that were not combatants.[/i] Can you cite a source for this that is reliable? The work of James Bacque has been largely discredited by legitimate historians, and his neo-Nazi revisionism seems to be what you are citing. The real figures seem to be in the tens of thousands(40-50), which is still too many. You want Russian casualties? More than anyone else; not a secret, 22 million, 7 million civilian. As far as my holocaust figures, those are widely accepted by most people. They are certainly not a quarter of that. I never said we were holding 'millions' of POWs today. We are holding thousands of 'enemy combatants', and apparently have refined our mistreatment of them. You see, dBoy, you consistently spout off 'facts' that have footing in reality. Like your fact in another thread that if two drivers marry, one has to resign. Total BS, and has been at least since the 1970's, like most of what you say. } [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Pro-Gun / Hunting Thread
Top