Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
question for pretzel regarding signature allowance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="atatbl" data-source="post: 728735" data-attributes="member: 12890"><p>This is correct. Also, the systems P-Man is speaking about are 'about' as universal as you can get at UPS.... if that makes any sense. I have a feeling I know what your management team is doing. I think all small package management that reads this board knows what they are doing. However, I will not speculate as to what someone's/some people's intentions are when I do not know them or the circumstances. This is especially relevant since you actually know these people and work with them daily.</p><p></p><p>I will, however, say this.... there is no <strong>reasonable</strong> way to change this based on route. </p><p></p><p>P-Man was exactly correct when he said "At best, the calculation can be changed by unit. If they did so, it would be violating process because a legitimate signature would get no allowance."</p><p></p><p>The unit changes are not negotiable by day. In fact, you would have to make major edits that would blink red to everyone of importance in the district. This is why I am saying <strong>reasonable</strong>. To put this in perspective....... For what you believed may have been happening and what the management team to have told you was happening...... It would not be an exaggeration to say that UPS would have to stop functioning as a whole and break down into mom 'n pop shops overnight. The timecard and DIR systems are linked to the top of the chain and it's no joke. That seems like a big statement..... I know.....</p><p></p><p>To ensure that I am not exaggerating here, I welcome any management person here to tell me if they don't believe my next statement to be true (including P-Man..... who could know this for a fact <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" />) Management commitee members and possibly the CEO look at a total number of SPC, SPOHR and gross over-allowed the next business day in the morning. Since not all situations can be accounted for there is probably a standard deviation trend that is used to figure the swing of accuracy on previous day results. What this means is that many (company-wide) timecards will be errors or erroneous in some way and will be corrected. If a certain district (due to a certain division, due to a certain center) keep skewing the numbers, it will be looked into. This is why it doesn't take a CSI team to terminate corrupt management.... they do it themselves.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="atatbl, post: 728735, member: 12890"] This is correct. Also, the systems P-Man is speaking about are 'about' as universal as you can get at UPS.... if that makes any sense. I have a feeling I know what your management team is doing. I think all small package management that reads this board knows what they are doing. However, I will not speculate as to what someone's/some people's intentions are when I do not know them or the circumstances. This is especially relevant since you actually know these people and work with them daily. I will, however, say this.... there is no [B]reasonable[/B] way to change this based on route. P-Man was exactly correct when he said "At best, the calculation can be changed by unit. If they did so, it would be violating process because a legitimate signature would get no allowance." The unit changes are not negotiable by day. In fact, you would have to make major edits that would blink red to everyone of importance in the district. This is why I am saying [B]reasonable[/B]. To put this in perspective....... For what you believed may have been happening and what the management team to have told you was happening...... It would not be an exaggeration to say that UPS would have to stop functioning as a whole and break down into mom 'n pop shops overnight. The timecard and DIR systems are linked to the top of the chain and it's no joke. That seems like a big statement..... I know..... To ensure that I am not exaggerating here, I welcome any management person here to tell me if they don't believe my next statement to be true (including P-Man..... who could know this for a fact :happy-very:) Management commitee members and possibly the CEO look at a total number of SPC, SPOHR and gross over-allowed the next business day in the morning. Since not all situations can be accounted for there is probably a standard deviation trend that is used to figure the swing of accuracy on previous day results. What this means is that many (company-wide) timecards will be errors or erroneous in some way and will be corrected. If a certain district (due to a certain division, due to a certain center) keep skewing the numbers, it will be looked into. This is why it doesn't take a CSI team to terminate corrupt management.... they do it themselves. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
question for pretzel regarding signature allowance
Top