Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Questions for Mike.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iconoclast" data-source="post: 195220" data-attributes="member: 8906"><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Tieguy - I don't see how putting out a 200 question ERI that covers every gamut of the job is exactly sticking your head in the sand. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: black">Putting the ERI out is certainly not sticking your head in the sand, no, I agree. Intimating that the ERI in its present state in just fine - save for those who answer the questions negatively, is, in my opinion sticking your head in the sand. Let' review your words for edification and reinforcement</span>.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: blue"><em>Tieguy - Those who complain about the eri are those who want the company to see an eri that is in the toilet. They don't believe the result of the eri because its not negative enough for them. The fact is most upsers come to work positive and they will answer most of the two hundred questions positively.</em></span></span></p><p> <span style="color: #0000ff"></span></p><p> <span style="color: #0000ff"></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Again you speak in parables and again you supply prose filled with rhetoric. Boiled frog at least supplys a couple of points on items he feels needs to be added to the survey. </span></p><p> <span style="color: #0000ff"></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"></span><span style="color: black">You should try it. I have worked very hard on my ability to communicate, and it has been a tremnedous help to me in business. I find that it is far more effective than calling people names or insulting them.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Characterizing the survey as unprofessional is illogical. If the third party administers it the same electronic way without any human interaction then their result would be the same. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black">Why on earth would a third party administer it in the same way? You are missing the point Tie, Administering the ERI goes far beyond just how the data is electronically captured-it entails organizing sufficient time to take it, convenient times for work groups to overlap, making sure there is full participation, having a dedicated controlled area to take it in-all of the things that have been discussed in this thread and other ERI threads. All of the things that make the ERI in its present state so unprofessional</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">You have now posted about 1000 words on this subject without identifying any tangible changes you feel need to be done other then to assume it would somehow be better if someone else did it. </span></p><p></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: black">Just because you have chosen to ignore that I have given concrete examples of how detailed the feedback information is - and how valuable information of that ilk can be to the employees and management team, doesn't mean that those companies don't have the ability to do just that, or that other people have not been able to read what I wrote. Go back to my posts, it's all right there.</span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: black">I have identified changes specific to the feedback information, identified dynamics specific to objectivity, and specific to a much more comprehensive and professional delivery of an Employee Relation Index</span>.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: black">Feel free to read my prior postings again Tie, I often re-read prior messages before and after I post, it often helps with perspective.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iconoclast, post: 195220, member: 8906"] [COLOR=#0000ff]Tieguy - I don't see how putting out a 200 question ERI that covers every gamut of the job is exactly sticking your head in the sand. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][COLOR=black]Putting the ERI out is certainly not sticking your head in the sand, no, I agree. Intimating that the ERI in its present state in just fine - save for those who answer the questions negatively, is, in my opinion sticking your head in the sand. Let' review your words for edification and reinforcement[/COLOR].[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][COLOR=blue][I]Tieguy - Those who complain about the eri are those who want the company to see an eri that is in the toilet. They don't believe the result of the eri because its not negative enough for them. The fact is most upsers come to work positive and they will answer most of the two hundred questions positively.[/I][/COLOR] Again you speak in parables and again you supply prose filled with rhetoric. Boiled frog at least supplys a couple of points on items he feels needs to be added to the survey. [/COLOR][COLOR=black]You should try it. I have worked very hard on my ability to communicate, and it has been a tremnedous help to me in business. I find that it is far more effective than calling people names or insulting them.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]Characterizing the survey as unprofessional is illogical. If the third party administers it the same electronic way without any human interaction then their result would be the same. [/COLOR] [COLOR=black]Why on earth would a third party administer it in the same way? You are missing the point Tie, Administering the ERI goes far beyond just how the data is electronically captured-it entails organizing sufficient time to take it, convenient times for work groups to overlap, making sure there is full participation, having a dedicated controlled area to take it in-all of the things that have been discussed in this thread and other ERI threads. All of the things that make the ERI in its present state so unprofessional[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]You have now posted about 1000 words on this subject without identifying any tangible changes you feel need to be done other then to assume it would somehow be better if someone else did it. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][COLOR=black]Just because you have chosen to ignore that I have given concrete examples of how detailed the feedback information is - and how valuable information of that ilk can be to the employees and management team, doesn't mean that those companies don't have the ability to do just that, or that other people have not been able to read what I wrote. Go back to my posts, it's all right there.[/COLOR][/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][COLOR=black]I have identified changes specific to the feedback information, identified dynamics specific to objectivity, and specific to a much more comprehensive and professional delivery of an Employee Relation Index[/COLOR].[/COLOR] [COLOR=black]Feel free to read my prior postings again Tie, I often re-read prior messages before and after I post, it often helps with perspective.[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Questions for Mike.
Top