Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Rail strike
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HyperBrn" data-source="post: 5461773" data-attributes="member: 102381"><p>The facts:</p><p></p><p>The House and Senate were asked to pass a law that:</p><p>1. Made a rail union strike ILLEGAL (IE if they decide to strike, they get arrested).</p><p>2. Forced the rail unions to work under the provisions set forth by the government in September.</p><p></p><p>The House proposed an amendment to add 7 paid sick days to the original set of provisions:</p><p>1. The amendment passed in the House</p><p>2. The amendment failed to get enough votes in the Senate.</p><p></p><p>Conscious of all this:</p><p>1. The original set of provisions were voted to be imposed by both the Senate and House.</p><p></p><p>Everyone is so quick to play the blame game. But really the blame should go to the railroad corporations.</p><p></p><p>Yes, the sick day amendment failed predominantly because Republicans voted predominantly no. </p><p>But the fact that Congress, and ultimately the President, voted to circumvent a union's RIGHT to strike (using a 96 year old law as the justification) suggests that the majority of Congressmen(women) are complicit in stripping the unions of their bargaining power and handing the railroad corporations a big win. </p><p></p><p>Think the railroad union negotiation was challenging this time? Just wait til this Congress-imposed contract expires. I bet/hope that it'll be even more contentious next time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HyperBrn, post: 5461773, member: 102381"] The facts: The House and Senate were asked to pass a law that: 1. Made a rail union strike ILLEGAL (IE if they decide to strike, they get arrested). 2. Forced the rail unions to work under the provisions set forth by the government in September. The House proposed an amendment to add 7 paid sick days to the original set of provisions: 1. The amendment passed in the House 2. The amendment failed to get enough votes in the Senate. Conscious of all this: 1. The original set of provisions were voted to be imposed by both the Senate and House. Everyone is so quick to play the blame game. But really the blame should go to the railroad corporations. Yes, the sick day amendment failed predominantly because Republicans voted predominantly no. But the fact that Congress, and ultimately the President, voted to circumvent a union's RIGHT to strike (using a 96 year old law as the justification) suggests that the majority of Congressmen(women) are complicit in stripping the unions of their bargaining power and handing the railroad corporations a big win. Think the railroad union negotiation was challenging this time? Just wait til this Congress-imposed contract expires. I bet/hope that it'll be even more contentious next time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Rail strike
Top