Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Reasonable cause testing for package car drivers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JustAnumber1" data-source="post: 1546444" data-attributes="member: 56683"><p>I posted the dot regulations, clearly stating controlled substances, which you say it doesn't, yet you still claim I'm the one that can't comprehend? Did you not read the regulations?</p><p></p><p>(b) An employer shall require a driver to submit to a controlled substances test when the employer hasreasonable suspicion to believe that the driver has violated the prohibitions of subpart B of this part concerning controlled substances. The employer's determination that reasonable suspicion exists to require the driver to undergo a controlled substances test must be based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech or body odors of the driver. The observations may includeindications of the chronic and withdrawal effects of controlled substances.</p><p></p><p>There they are again, you're still trying to convince yourself that doesn't say controlled substances, ok.</p><p></p><p>I don't know what law firms want, I do know that I have a standing offer at a law firm. Never said they would pay me to go to college, they are willing to help me with tuition if I am not able to pay it all myself.</p><p></p><p>I was never a full time driver, I was driving full time for peak, I have stated this before, another example that you need to work on your reading comprehension skills.</p><p></p><p>Don't have millions saved up, have enough to pay for most, if not all the expenses I would incur attending law school.</p><p></p><p>Haha, another incorrect presumption, I actually work for the law firm I've made reference to, worked there after I got off of my part time job at ups.</p><p></p><p>I suppose I am on a high horse, if that's what you call confidence.</p><p></p><p>I didn't have to resign, that's why it's called a resignation. I did choose to resign, because my local would not do its job and I always knew ups wasn't someplace I wanted a career. I had become complacent.</p><p></p><p>Nope, haven't tried to impress anyone, just illustrating that I'm far from being in a breadline, far from destitute and that I am taking advantage of the freedom I never had at ups.</p><p></p><p>So you can "get it straight", I was employed by the law firm prior to my resignation, they didn't just hire me. Yes, I do have enough money saved up to live comfortably for years and years, or fund a j.d., but you are kind of right, I don't have enough to do both. You're wrong once again about the big name law firm, it's actaully a small law firm, but it sure does provide a comfortable living for all of it's employees and a lot less stress than ups. If my life sounds like it came from a tv series, what can I say, it's not a bad life, I certainly enjoy it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JustAnumber1, post: 1546444, member: 56683"] I posted the dot regulations, clearly stating controlled substances, which you say it doesn't, yet you still claim I'm the one that can't comprehend? Did you not read the regulations? (b) An employer shall require a driver to submit to a controlled substances test when the employer hasreasonable suspicion to believe that the driver has violated the prohibitions of subpart B of this part concerning controlled substances. The employer's determination that reasonable suspicion exists to require the driver to undergo a controlled substances test must be based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech or body odors of the driver. The observations may includeindications of the chronic and withdrawal effects of controlled substances. There they are again, you're still trying to convince yourself that doesn't say controlled substances, ok. I don't know what law firms want, I do know that I have a standing offer at a law firm. Never said they would pay me to go to college, they are willing to help me with tuition if I am not able to pay it all myself. I was never a full time driver, I was driving full time for peak, I have stated this before, another example that you need to work on your reading comprehension skills. Don't have millions saved up, have enough to pay for most, if not all the expenses I would incur attending law school. Haha, another incorrect presumption, I actually work for the law firm I've made reference to, worked there after I got off of my part time job at ups. I suppose I am on a high horse, if that's what you call confidence. I didn't have to resign, that's why it's called a resignation. I did choose to resign, because my local would not do its job and I always knew ups wasn't someplace I wanted a career. I had become complacent. Nope, haven't tried to impress anyone, just illustrating that I'm far from being in a breadline, far from destitute and that I am taking advantage of the freedom I never had at ups. So you can "get it straight", I was employed by the law firm prior to my resignation, they didn't just hire me. Yes, I do have enough money saved up to live comfortably for years and years, or fund a j.d., but you are kind of right, I don't have enough to do both. You're wrong once again about the big name law firm, it's actaully a small law firm, but it sure does provide a comfortable living for all of it's employees and a lot less stress than ups. If my life sounds like it came from a tv series, what can I say, it's not a bad life, I certainly enjoy it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Reasonable cause testing for package car drivers
Top