Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
red circled employee
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Expendable" data-source="post: 239866" data-attributes="member: 11466"><p>No part-timer "paid" for a combo job. Article 22 was to change the company practice of using part time employees when they could use full timers. That creates more full-time positions, which are more lucrative jobs. Part-timers are not excluded when a package driver with more seniority takes a combo, he also opens a full-time job! Get the driving job and wait your turn. Why should a worker who never takes a full-time job for years get the inside track on a combo before another with more seniority, just because the other worker was a driver? Are they just somehow special?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Expendable, post: 239866, member: 11466"] No part-timer "paid" for a combo job. Article 22 was to change the company practice of using part time employees when they could use full timers. That creates more full-time positions, which are more lucrative jobs. Part-timers are not excluded when a package driver with more seniority takes a combo, he also opens a full-time job! Get the driving job and wait your turn. Why should a worker who never takes a full-time job for years get the inside track on a combo before another with more seniority, just because the other worker was a driver? Are they just somehow special? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
red circled employee
Top