Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Rick Perrys Greatest Hits! This will be good!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 875597" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Seems the stove between Perry and Paul is getting turned up and by bothsides. Paul has been attacking Perry's "conservative" creds. and some feel it may have a <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/179657-ron-paul-blasts-rick-perry" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">terminal effect </span></a>on the Perry campaign. On the otherhand, Perry IMO has <a href="http://theiowarepublican.com/2011/ron-paul%E2%80%99s-reagan-revisionism/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">raised</span></a> a very good question on Paul in that in 1987' he did formally resign from the republican party and the main driving factor was the policies of one Ronald Reagan. This flies in the face of recent events where Paul is using Reagan to promote his own creds. It also raises the question for Paul if in 1987' he left the republican party, why he came back? What changed prompting him to do so?</p><p></p><p>While the move by Perry was a good one, it's not without it's risks. Paul's resignation letter does not paint a pretty picture of Reagan or the republican party in what it normally alleges as it's principles but it also shows when it comes to gov't policy a real consistent stance by Paul for nearly 30 years. It also shows some bi-partisanship on Paul's part is giving credit where credit is due and that may sit well with some independent voters who just might be willing to vote and shake up the status quo. </p><p></p><p>Regardless, Romney IMO is the one winning in all of this as he seems to be out doing his own thing a bit under the radar and raising money for later when the real campaign season goes full bore. I still think he is the party favorite son regardless of the other goings on and barring his own implosion at his own hand, the party elite will crack the whip and all the automatons will fall in line just like they do ever election. Neither party it should now be easy to see has any real principles what so ever other than whatever it takes to get and then stay elected. Controlling power is all that it's about and nothing will change that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 875597, member: 2189"] Seems the stove between Perry and Paul is getting turned up and by bothsides. Paul has been attacking Perry's "conservative" creds. and some feel it may have a [URL="http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/179657-ron-paul-blasts-rick-perry"][COLOR=#ff0000]terminal effect [/COLOR][/URL]on the Perry campaign. On the otherhand, Perry IMO has [URL="http://theiowarepublican.com/2011/ron-paul%E2%80%99s-reagan-revisionism/"][COLOR=#ff0000]raised[/COLOR][/URL] a very good question on Paul in that in 1987' he did formally resign from the republican party and the main driving factor was the policies of one Ronald Reagan. This flies in the face of recent events where Paul is using Reagan to promote his own creds. It also raises the question for Paul if in 1987' he left the republican party, why he came back? What changed prompting him to do so? While the move by Perry was a good one, it's not without it's risks. Paul's resignation letter does not paint a pretty picture of Reagan or the republican party in what it normally alleges as it's principles but it also shows when it comes to gov't policy a real consistent stance by Paul for nearly 30 years. It also shows some bi-partisanship on Paul's part is giving credit where credit is due and that may sit well with some independent voters who just might be willing to vote and shake up the status quo. Regardless, Romney IMO is the one winning in all of this as he seems to be out doing his own thing a bit under the radar and raising money for later when the real campaign season goes full bore. I still think he is the party favorite son regardless of the other goings on and barring his own implosion at his own hand, the party elite will crack the whip and all the automatons will fall in line just like they do ever election. Neither party it should now be easy to see has any real principles what so ever other than whatever it takes to get and then stay elected. Controlling power is all that it's about and nothing will change that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Rick Perrys Greatest Hits! This will be good!
Top