Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Rittenhouse Trial
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wilberforce15" data-source="post: 5068406" data-attributes="member: 5053"><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1325&context=lawineq[/URL]</p><p></p><p>The case of William Penn (yes, that William Penn) and William Mead.</p><p></p><p>Common law had established jury nullification a century before the constitution, at least.</p><p></p><p>"Penn's steadfastness and the inflexible firmness of the jury in maintaining their own rights, and adhering to their conscientious convictions, allowed a great stride in the evolution of <strong>the jury as a free, judicial body</strong>."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wilberforce15, post: 5068406, member: 5053"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1325&context=lawineq[/URL] The case of William Penn (yes, that William Penn) and William Mead. Common law had established jury nullification a century before the constitution, at least. "Penn's steadfastness and the inflexible firmness of the jury in maintaining their own rights, and adhering to their conscientious convictions, allowed a great stride in the evolution of [B]the jury as a free, judicial body[/B]." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Rittenhouse Trial
Top
