Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
rumors!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Overpaid Union Thug" data-source="post: 1496685" data-attributes="member: 198"><p>Yes we absorbed a rather small local and it pushed our area (in terms of miles) farther west. If things were like what I suggested I don't believe it would be as complicated as I think you are suggesting. It seems to work in other areas that do it that way. I would want it set up in a way that keeps a driver from getting bumped out of one building and the result would be him/her having to commute to the other side of the local to work in another. It wouldn't be right for a driver, feeder driver, etc. that works in Whites Creek to get bumped out of their center and end up having to bid into Paris or Tullahoma. There is at least one local somewhere that allows crap like that. Thats what I've read on this forum anyway. </p><p></p><p>I would make it to where vacated package, feeder, and 22.3 positions would be bid locally and newly created positions (package, feeder, 22.3s) would be too. But the route bidding procedure wouldn't apply locally. I'm sure you can probably spot at least one whole in this theory but that doesn't mean there isn't a way to make something similar work. </p><p></p><p>The way our local does things now is definitely a cluster **** and it is blatantly done that way to benefit one building. And that needs to stop.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Overpaid Union Thug, post: 1496685, member: 198"] Yes we absorbed a rather small local and it pushed our area (in terms of miles) farther west. If things were like what I suggested I don't believe it would be as complicated as I think you are suggesting. It seems to work in other areas that do it that way. I would want it set up in a way that keeps a driver from getting bumped out of one building and the result would be him/her having to commute to the other side of the local to work in another. It wouldn't be right for a driver, feeder driver, etc. that works in Whites Creek to get bumped out of their center and end up having to bid into Paris or Tullahoma. There is at least one local somewhere that allows crap like that. Thats what I've read on this forum anyway. I would make it to where vacated package, feeder, and 22.3 positions would be bid locally and newly created positions (package, feeder, 22.3s) would be too. But the route bidding procedure wouldn't apply locally. I'm sure you can probably spot at least one whole in this theory but that doesn't mean there isn't a way to make something similar work. The way our local does things now is definitely a cluster **** and it is blatantly done that way to benefit one building. And that needs to stop. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
rumors!
Top