Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Seasonal personal vehicle package delivery driver
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="scooby0048" data-source="post: 4270115" data-attributes="member: 50693"><p>The article I cited says that the company would be responsible for damages to both parties if an employee uses a personal vehicle for company business. I agree that the PVD should have insurance no matter what, but the argument is whether the company would classify the PVD as an employee and cover them AND whether a court of law would classify them as an employee or IC.</p><p></p><p>People are saying that their insurance would not cover a PVD involved in a collision because that PVD was basically working as a delivery company. So even though there is an article claiming to cover personal vehicles in the event of a collision, the question remains,</p><p></p><p>Is the PVD an employee thus afforded the protection of the article I cited. Or, is the PVD an IC afforded no company protection and left to their own resources in the event of a collision? This would be an interesting case to present to the courts. Personally, in my experience, I would tend to think the courts would see the PVD as an employee of UPS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="scooby0048, post: 4270115, member: 50693"] The article I cited says that the company would be responsible for damages to both parties if an employee uses a personal vehicle for company business. I agree that the PVD should have insurance no matter what, but the argument is whether the company would classify the PVD as an employee and cover them AND whether a court of law would classify them as an employee or IC. People are saying that their insurance would not cover a PVD involved in a collision because that PVD was basically working as a delivery company. So even though there is an article claiming to cover personal vehicles in the event of a collision, the question remains, Is the PVD an employee thus afforded the protection of the article I cited. Or, is the PVD an IC afforded no company protection and left to their own resources in the event of a collision? This would be an interesting case to present to the courts. Personally, in my experience, I would tend to think the courts would see the PVD as an employee of UPS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Seasonal personal vehicle package delivery driver
Top