Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Section 1a Article 37
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PiedmontSteward" data-source="post: 2037258" data-attributes="member: 42270"><p>"Perceived [legal] liability" is one of the few things that can get UPS moving on stuff like this. If there's even perceived age discrimination, an EEOC charge can also help grease the skids. </p><p></p><p>The "gold standard" for a grievance like this involves two witness statements to support the grievant's version of events. This is next to impossible with a lot of the harassment/intimidation that goes on; a comment made by a supervisor in passing in the building or an on-car supervisor doing a production ride along. </p><p></p><p>That's why the recent Whole Foods "recording" case is so interesting; while it wasn't applicable to harassment per se, it granted workers the right to record an anti-union captive audience meeting <strong>in spite of</strong> the company's policy to the contrary. While I wouldn't recommend someone doing so, a recording like this is going to eventually surface. </p><p></p><p>I'm just curious if anyone is going to have the nuts to try and run with it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PiedmontSteward, post: 2037258, member: 42270"] "Perceived [legal] liability" is one of the few things that can get UPS moving on stuff like this. If there's even perceived age discrimination, an EEOC charge can also help grease the skids. The "gold standard" for a grievance like this involves two witness statements to support the grievant's version of events. This is next to impossible with a lot of the harassment/intimidation that goes on; a comment made by a supervisor in passing in the building or an on-car supervisor doing a production ride along. That's why the recent Whole Foods "recording" case is so interesting; while it wasn't applicable to harassment per se, it granted workers the right to record an anti-union captive audience meeting [B]in spite of[/B] the company's policy to the contrary. While I wouldn't recommend someone doing so, a recording like this is going to eventually surface. I'm just curious if anyone is going to have the nuts to try and run with it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Section 1a Article 37
Top