Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Section 230 - ERODING AMERICANS' FREEDOMS AND RIGHTS WHILE PROMOTING ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jiangshi" data-source="post: 5521398" data-attributes="member: 98352"><p>I wonder if this is behind recent actions on this site? Bold is mine.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/21/tech/supreme-court-gonzalez-v-google/index.html[/URL]</p><p></p><p><em> Barrett referenced an exit ramp the Supreme Court has that would allow it to avoid the big legal question over the scope of Section 230.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p> <em></em></p><p><em> She pointed to the tech case the court will hear Wednesday, in which the justices will consider whether an anti-terrorism law covers internet platforms for<strong> their failure to adequate remove terrorism-related conduct. The same law is being used by the plaintiffs to sue Google in Tuesday’s case.</strong></em></p><p><em></em></p><p> <em></em></p><p><em> “So if you lose tomorrow, do we even have to reach the Section 230 question here? Would you concede that you would lose on that ground here?” Barrett asked Schnapper.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jiangshi, post: 5521398, member: 98352"] I wonder if this is behind recent actions on this site? Bold is mine. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/21/tech/supreme-court-gonzalez-v-google/index.html[/URL] [I] Barrett referenced an exit ramp the Supreme Court has that would allow it to avoid the big legal question over the scope of Section 230. She pointed to the tech case the court will hear Wednesday, in which the justices will consider whether an anti-terrorism law covers internet platforms for[B] their failure to adequate remove terrorism-related conduct. The same law is being used by the plaintiffs to sue Google in Tuesday’s case.[/B] “So if you lose tomorrow, do we even have to reach the Section 230 question here? Would you concede that you would lose on that ground here?” Barrett asked Schnapper.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Section 230 - ERODING AMERICANS' FREEDOMS AND RIGHTS WHILE PROMOTING ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES
Top