Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
space and vis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="canon" data-source="post: 164066" data-attributes="member: 8423"><p>Aww, look at the little bad rep comment tie left for me. Don't go the coward route tie, face me in here. Nobody said drivers are perfect. But for the ones that happen to know what they are doing and manage to not mess up during an evaluation,<em> then yes the supes lack integrity when they falsify documents to make themselves look somehow more apt to find and correct fault.</em></p><p></p><p>Perhaps we just have different definitions of the word integrity. I'm going by this one:</p><p></p><p><strong>in·teg·ri·ty</strong> (n-tgr-t)</p><p>n.</p><p>1. <span style="color: Red"><strong>Steadfast adherence to a strict moral or ethical code.</strong></span></p><p>2. The state of being unimpaired; soundness.</p><p>3. The quality or condition of being whole or undivided; completeness.</p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">Source: <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/integrity" target="_blank">http://www.thefreedictionary.com/integrity</a></span></p><p></p><p>I am guessing you are doing nothing more than coming to your own defense as you've probably done the exact same thing many times. In my dictionary, you lack integrity. I await the definition which says it is ok to make up answers on an evaluation. It's not an attack tie, <em>by definition</em> this practice is unethical. The supes are just trying to make themselves look better to corporate: "<em>Oooo good thing that supe was able to correct that driver! His observational skills probably saved us an accident!</em>" </p><p></p><p>I like this definition too:</p><p></p><p><strong>scam</strong> (skm) Slang</p><p>n.</p><p><strong><span style="color: Red">A fraudulent business scheme</span></strong>; a swindle.</p><p>tr.v. scammed, scam·ming, scams</p><p>To defraud; swindle.</p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">Source: <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/scam" target="_blank">http://www.thefreedictionary.com/scam</a></span></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's not like we're talking about a huge secret... most drivers know the reports only serve to be cosmetic improvements for a supe's career. If we really took them seriously, there would be no need to "make up a few mistakes". Management doesn't take them seriously, so neither do I. </p><p></p><p>See how that works? <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/thumbup1.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":thumbup1:" title="Thumbup1 :thumbup1:" data-shortname=":thumbup1:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="canon, post: 164066, member: 8423"] Aww, look at the little bad rep comment tie left for me. Don't go the coward route tie, face me in here. Nobody said drivers are perfect. But for the ones that happen to know what they are doing and manage to not mess up during an evaluation,[I] then yes the supes lack integrity when they falsify documents to make themselves look somehow more apt to find and correct fault.[/I] Perhaps we just have different definitions of the word integrity. I'm going by this one: [B]in·teg·ri·ty[/B] (n-tgr-t) n. 1. [COLOR="Red"][B]Steadfast adherence to a strict moral or ethical code.[/B][/COLOR] 2. The state of being unimpaired; soundness. 3. The quality or condition of being whole or undivided; completeness. [SIZE="1"]Source: [url]http://www.thefreedictionary.com/integrity[/url][/SIZE] I am guessing you are doing nothing more than coming to your own defense as you've probably done the exact same thing many times. In my dictionary, you lack integrity. I await the definition which says it is ok to make up answers on an evaluation. It's not an attack tie, [I]by definition[/I] this practice is unethical. The supes are just trying to make themselves look better to corporate: "[I]Oooo good thing that supe was able to correct that driver! His observational skills probably saved us an accident![/I]" I like this definition too: [B]scam[/B] (skm) Slang n. [B][COLOR="Red"]A fraudulent business scheme[/COLOR][/B]; a swindle. tr.v. scammed, scam·ming, scams To defraud; swindle. [SIZE="1"]Source: [url]http://www.thefreedictionary.com/scam[/url][/SIZE] It's not like we're talking about a huge secret... most drivers know the reports only serve to be cosmetic improvements for a supe's career. If we really took them seriously, there would be no need to "make up a few mistakes". Management doesn't take them seriously, so neither do I. See how that works? :thumbup1: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
space and vis
Top